Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35313819›Full record

Trial reportBMC geriatrics2022

Efficacy and acceptability of using wearable activity trackers in older adults living in retirement communities: a mixed method study.

Zhanjia Zhang, Bruno Giordani, Alayna Margulis, Weiyun Chen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC geriatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05233813 (A Pilot Study of Testing the Multilevel Active Body and Mind), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05233813 nacompletednot on this map

A Pilot Study of Testing the Multilevel Active Body and Mind (ABM) Intervention for Older Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MichiganRan2019 to 2019Enrolled59ConditionsWell AgingArmsActive Body and Mind
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Benefits of a Wearable Activity Tracker with Safety Features for Older Adults: An Intervention Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Zhanjia ZhangDepartment of Physical Education, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.
Bruno GiordaniDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Alayna MargulisSchool of Kinesiology, University of Michigan, 1402 Washington Heights, 3145 OBL, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Weiyun ChenSchool of Kinesiology, University of Michigan, 1402 Washington Heights, 3145 OBL, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. chenwy@umich.edu.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWearable activity trackers hold the potential for enhancing health and fitness, but the use of wearable activity trackers has remained largely unexplored in older adults. The purpose of the current study was to examine the effectiveness and acceptability of wearable activity trackers for promoting physical activity (PA) in older adults living in retirement communities.

methodsForty older adult participants (mean age = 85.4 years) used a wearable activity tracker (Fitbit InspireHR) for 12 weeks. Participants were provided with personalized activity goals and weekly feedback of PA during the 12 weeks. The main outcomes were daily step counts collected at baseline and the end of the intervention, and participants' experiences of using the wearable activity tracker assessed after the 12-week intervention through an 8-item questionnaire and individual interviews.

resultsParticipants used the activity tracker on 97.5% of measured days and had an average increase of 900 steps/day (p < 0.001). The Acceptance questionnaire revealed that the wearable activity tracker was acceptable, useful, and easy to use. Participants found that wearable activity trackers helped improve self-awareness and motivation of PA but reported a few concerns regarding the comfort of wearing the activity trackers and the ease of reading visual feedback.

conclusionsWearable activity trackers lead to a small but significant increase of PA and are perceived as acceptable and useful in older adults. Given the rapidly growing older population, wearable activity trackers are promising tools that could be used in large-scale interventions to improve PA and health in older adults.

trial registrationRegistered on Clinicaltrials.gov # NCT05233813 (Registered on 10/02/2022).

Indexed as

Fitness TrackersRetirementAgedAged, 80 and overExerciseHumansMotivationResearch DesignExerciseRetirement communitySelf-regulationTechnology

Identifiers

PMID35313819
PMCPMC8935620
OpenAlexW4220661545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.