Trial reportBMC geriatrics2022
Efficacy and acceptability of using wearable activity trackers in older adults living in retirement communities: a mixed method study.
Trial report in BMC geriatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05233813 (A Pilot Study of Testing the Multilevel Active Body and Mind), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Pilot Study of Testing the Multilevel Active Body and Mind (ABM) Intervention for Older Adults
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Community-Dwelling Older Adults' Experience With Activity Trackers: Effects of Monitoring Physical Activity.Journal of gerontological nursing · 2026Article
- Experiences of Home-Dwelling Older Adults and Their Family Caregivers With Digital Health Services: Qualitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Lived Experiences of Older Adults Using Wearables With Real-Time Feedback: Phenomenological Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Article
- Social factors, wearable activity tracker use frequency, and physical activity patterns among U.S. older adults: findings from a national cross-sectional survey.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Implementation of wearable activity trackers in hospital rehabilitation: a feasibility study tailored to local settings.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- The impact of physical exercise on medical expenditure among middle-aged and older adults: digital literacy as a moderating variable.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Three Body-Worn Accelerometers in the French NutriNet-Santé Cohort: Feasibility and Acceptability Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Shaping the future of geriatric chronic pain care: a research agenda for progress.Pain management · 2025Article
- Qualitative insights from an online community-based exercise intervention for persons living with HIV.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2025Article
- Relationship Between the Use of Fitness Trackers and Smartwatches for Monitoring Physical Activity and the Sociodemographic Characteristics of Long-Term Care Residents During the COVID-19 Lockdown.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Observational
- Acceptability of a remotely delivered sedentary behaviour intervention to improve sarcopenia and maintain independent living in older adults with frailty: a mixed-methods study.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- Electronic Wearable Device Use for Physical Activity in Older Adults: A Qualitative Study.Work, aging and retirement · 2024Article
- The use of commercial wrist-worn technology to track physiological outcomes in behavioral interventions.Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care · 2023Review
- Wearable Activity Trackers Objectively Measure Incidental Physical Activity in Older Adults Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Benefits of a Wearable Activity Tracker with Safety Features for Older Adults: An Intervention Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Digital health-based physical activity and cognitive function in older adults: A bibliometric analysis.Digital healthReview
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWearable activity trackers hold the potential for enhancing health and fitness, but the use of wearable activity trackers has remained largely unexplored in older adults. The purpose of the current study was to examine the effectiveness and acceptability of wearable activity trackers for promoting physical activity (PA) in older adults living in retirement communities.
methodsForty older adult participants (mean age = 85.4 years) used a wearable activity tracker (Fitbit InspireHR) for 12 weeks. Participants were provided with personalized activity goals and weekly feedback of PA during the 12 weeks. The main outcomes were daily step counts collected at baseline and the end of the intervention, and participants' experiences of using the wearable activity tracker assessed after the 12-week intervention through an 8-item questionnaire and individual interviews.
resultsParticipants used the activity tracker on 97.5% of measured days and had an average increase of 900 steps/day (p < 0.001). The Acceptance questionnaire revealed that the wearable activity tracker was acceptable, useful, and easy to use. Participants found that wearable activity trackers helped improve self-awareness and motivation of PA but reported a few concerns regarding the comfort of wearing the activity trackers and the ease of reading visual feedback.
conclusionsWearable activity trackers lead to a small but significant increase of PA and are perceived as acceptable and useful in older adults. Given the rapidly growing older population, wearable activity trackers are promising tools that could be used in large-scale interventions to improve PA and health in older adults.
trial registrationRegistered on Clinicaltrials.gov # NCT05233813 (Registered on 10/02/2022).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.