Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35313801›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2022

QTL detection for bread wheat processing quality in a nested association mapping population of semi-wild and domesticated wheat varieties.

Junmei Hu, Guilian Xiao, Peng Jiang, Yan Zhao, Guangxu Zhang, Xin Ma, Jie Yao, Lixia Xue, Peisen Su, Yinguang Bao

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Association mapping of hybrid seed set and heterosis in a central European multi-parental wheat population.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Junmei Hu *State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Shandong Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, College of Agronomy, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, 271018, The People's Republic of China.
Guilian Xiao *State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Shandong Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, College of Agronomy, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, 271018, The People's Republic of China.
Peng JiangState Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Shandong Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, College of Agronomy, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, 271018, The People's Republic of China.
Yan ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Shandong Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, College of Agronomy, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, 271018, The People's Republic of China.
Guangxu ZhangLianyungang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lianyungang, 222000, The People's Republic of China.
Xin MaState Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Shandong Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, College of Agronomy, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, 271018, The People's Republic of China.
Jie YaoYantai Academy of Agricultural Sciences in Shandong Province, Yantai, 265500, The People's Republic of China.
Lixia XueAgricultural Technology Station, Sunwu Sub-district Office, Huimin County, Shandong Province, 251700, Binzhou, The People's Republic of China.
Peisen SuCollege of Agriculture, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng, 252059, The People's Republic of China. pssu2014@163.com.
Yinguang BaoState Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Shandong Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, College of Agronomy, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, 271018, The People's Republic of China. baoyinguang@163.com.
Shandong Agricultural University · CNState Key Laboratory of Crop BiologyLiaocheng University · CNLiaoning Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNYantai Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWheat processing quality is an important factor in evaluating overall wheat quality, and dough characteristics are important when assessing the processing quality of wheat. As a notable germplasm resource, semi-wild wheat has a key role in the study of wheat processing quality.

resultsIn this study, four dough rheological characteristics were collected in four environments using a nested association mapping (NAM) population consisting of semi-wild and domesticated wheat varieties to identify quantitative trait loci (QTL) for wheat processing quality. A total of 49 QTL for wheat processing quality were detected, explaining 0.36-10.82% of the phenotypic variation. These QTL were located on all wheat chromosomes except for 2D, 3A, 3D, 6B, 6D and 7D. Compared to previous studies, 29 QTL were newly identified. Four novel QTL, QMlPH-1B.4, QMlPH-3B.4, QWdEm-1B.2 and QWdEm-3B.2, were stably identified in three or more environments, among which QMlPH-3B.4 was a major QTL. Moreover, eight important genetic regions for wheat processing quality were identified on chromosomes 1B, 3B and 4D, which showed pleiotropy for dough characteristics. In addition, out of 49 QTL, 15 favorable alleles came from three semi-wild parents, suggesting that the QTL alleles provided by the semi-wild parent were not utilized in domesticated varieties.

conclusionsThe results show that semi-wild wheat varieties can enrich the existing wheat gene pool and provide broader variation resources for wheat genetic research.

Indexed as

BreadChromosome MappingFood QualityQuantitative Trait LociRheologyChinaChromosomes, PlantCrops, AgriculturalGenes, PlantGenetic VariationGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotypePhenotypeTriticumNested association mapping (NAM) populationProcessing qualityQuantitative trait locusSemi-wild wheatWheat

Identifiers

PMID35313801
PMCPMC8935700
OpenAlexW4221114269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.