Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35313775›Full record

Trial reportIntegrative cancer therapies

A Single-Arm Phase II Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of First-Line Treatment With DCVAC/LuCa, Standard of Care Chemotherapy and Shenqi Fuzheng Injection in Advanced (Stage IIIB/IV) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients.

Qing Liu, Yanni Lou, Liya Li, Guowang Yang, Huijuan Cui, Zhiqiang Cheng, Yuan Li, Meng Liu, Chao Deng, Donggui Wan and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Integrative cancer therapies. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Qing LiuChina-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8534-3384
Yanni LouChina-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3181-494X
Liya LiChina-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Guowang YangBeijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Huijuan CuiChina-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhiqiang ChengChina-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yuan LiChina-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Meng LiuChina-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Chao DengChina-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Donggui WanChina-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yongxia YanCixian Institute for Cancer Prevention and Control (Cixian Cancer Hospital), Cixian, Hebei Province, China.
Liqun JiaChina-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
China-Japan Friendship Hospital · CNBeijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNCixian People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of first-line treatment with a dendritic cell vaccination for lung cancer (DCVAC/LuCa), standard of care chemotherapy and Shenqi Fuzheng injection in patients with advanced (stage IIIB/IV) non-small cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients with histologically or cytologically confirmed recurrent metastatic or advanced NSCLC (stage IIIB/IV) with wild-type epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or EGFR mutation which does not confer increased tumor susceptibility to EGFR-interacting drugs were recruited. For the treatment period, the first cycle of standard of care therapy (SoC) started 2 to 14 days after the leukapheresis procedure. SoC continued 4 to 6 cycles. DCVAC/LuCa was administered from the second cycle of SoC. DCVAC/LuCa was administered in a 3-week cycle schedule (5 doses) and then in a 6-week cycle schedule. Shenqi Fuzheng injection was administered 3 days before each DCVAC/LuCa administration for a total of 14 daily doses. Patients would undergo disease evaluation by computed tomography (CT) scan every 3 months. The primary and secondary endpoint was efficacy with regard to objective response rate (ORR) and progression free survival (PFS). The safety profile was measured by: incidence, type, and severity of all adverse events (AEs), laboratory abnormalities (blood routine test, urine test, and chemical test), physical status, and vital signs. Qi insufficiency was evaluated by tongue diagnosis and questionnaire survey with "Classification and Determination of constitution in TCM."

resultsTwenty-three patients from 3 hospitals who received combination therapy were included. ORR was 34.8% (95% CI:16.4%-57.3%). Median duration of response was 5.51 m (95% CI:2.70-8.32). Median PFS was 10.72 m (95% CI:4.52-16.93), 1-year survival was 77.8%. mOS was 21.97 m (95% CI:13.68-30.25). There was 1 severe AE related to a history of heart disease and there were no adverse events related to DCVAC/LuCa treatment. Qi insufficiency was improved significantly (

conclusionDCVAC/LuCa, combined with standard of care chemotherapy and Shenqi Fuzheng injection exhibited good benefit in Chinese patients with recurrent metastatic or advanced (stage IIIB/IV) NSCLC, and also significantly improved Qi insufficiency constitution. There were no related adverse events with DCVAC/LuCa treatment.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsVaccinationCombined Modality TherapyDendritic CellsDrugs, Chinese HerbalErbB ReceptorsHumansStandard of CareTreatment OutcomeDrugs, Chinese HerbalErbB Receptorsshenqi fuzhengchemotherapyDCVAC/LuCafirst-line treatmentnon-small cell lung cancerShenqi Fuzheng injection

Identifiers

PMID35313775
PMCPMC8943553
OpenAlexW4221115683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.