ArticleSTAR protocols2022
Protocol for assessing auditory brainstem response in mice using a four-channel recording system.
Article in STAR protocols, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improvements in hearing loss with bone-targeted enzyme replacement therapy are associated with corrected hypomineralization and osteocyte properties of auditory ossicles in Enpp1-deficient mice.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2025Article
- Comprehensive behavioral characterization and impaired hippocampal synaptic transmission in R1117X Shank3 mutant mice.Translational psychiatry · 2025Article
- Bioinspired Soft Elastic Metamaterials for Reconstruction of Natural Hearing.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- Universal Recommendations on Planning and Performing the Auditory Brainstem Responses (ABR) with a Focus on Mice and Rats.Audiology research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evaluating auditory sensitivity is critical to hearing research, particularly to that focusing on hearing impairment. Auditory brainstem response recording is frequently used in mice to assess auditory sensitivity and is an approach superior to the traditional techniques. Here, we describe a protocol for recording ABR in mice using four-channel equipment. We detail the procedures of animal preparation, the setup of the ABR recording system, the click- and tone burst-evoked ABR recordings, and data analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.