ArticleJournal of inflammation research2022
Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immuno-instructive biomaterials for coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction repair.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2026Review
- Increased Local Expression of Interleukin-1β in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction with Local Layered Plaque.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- The Multifaceted Role of Platelets in Atherosclerosis and Ischemic Disease: Pathogenesis, Inflammation, and Therapeutic Opportunities.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- TNF-α and E-Selectin as Valuable Biomarkers in Patients with Acute Coronary Artery Syndrome.International journal of molecular and cellular medicine · 2025Article
- Differential circulating cytokine profiles in acute coronary syndrome versus stable coronary artery disease.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Serum IL-38 Level Was Associated with Incidence of MACE in the STEMI Patients.International journal of general medicine · 2023Article
- The abnormal level and prognostic potency of multiple inflammatory cytokines in PCI-treated STEMI patients.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2022Article
- Biomarkers to monitor the prognosis, disease severity, and treatment efficacy in coronary artery disease.Expert review of cardiovascular therapyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Patients with plaque rupture (PR) present with different cardiovascular risks, clinical strategies, and outcomes from those with plaque erosion (PE). However, there are lack of noninvasive biomarkers to distinguish PE from PR. Methods: A prospective analysis of 382 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) was conducted. Of these patients, 262 and 120 presented with PR and PE, respectively. An additional 83 patients diagnosed with stable angina pectoris were enrolled as control group. Peripheral blood monocytes were collected pre-percutaneous coronary intervention and used to evaluate the mRNA expression of Results: STEMI patients had higher Conclusion: The inflammatory response of peripheral blood mononuclear cells in patients with PR was higher than that in patients with PE. TNF-α may be a potential biomarker for predicting PR that could facilitate risk stratification and management in STEMI patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.