SynthesisJournal of healthcare engineering2022
Contrast Agent and Molecular Imaging Meta-Analysis of the Clinical Effect of Intelligent Image Sensor Combined with Visual Training in the Treatment of Children with Intermittent Exotropia in China.
Synthesis in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Non-surgical treatment of strabismus in children: a review of recent advances.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Retracted: Contrast Agent and Molecular Imaging Meta-Analysis of the Clinical Effect of Intelligent Image Sensor Combined with Visual Training in the Treatment of Children with Intermittent Exotropia in China.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-10-11Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Paper Mill · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
At present, the main treatment for strabismus is still surgical treatment, but there is no unified standard for the evaluation of the timing of surgery. This study mainly explores the clinical effects of using meta-analysis of intelligent image sensors combined with visual training to treat children with intermittent exotropia. Cochrane systematic reviews collect, evaluate, and synthesize an increasing number of original clinical research results to obtain the comprehensive effect of relevant interventions, so as to provide real and reliable evidence for health decision-making and clinical practice. It uses scientific, clear, and reproducible research methods to reduce the influence of biased factors, so it is different from traditional reviews. Cochrane systematic reviews are especially suitable for certain interventions when the pros and cons of interventions are difficult to determine based on the results of a single clinical study or when there are large differences in the clinical application process. Poor quality systematic reviews can mislead policymakers and clinicians. In the meta-analysis, the Cochrane systematic evaluation method of evidence-based medicine was used to comprehensively search the published literature research on the treatment of intermittent exotropia with vision training. Using the Cochrane system evaluation method, computer search of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Chinese Journal Full-text Database, manual retrieval of relevant conference documents, and inclusion of all clinical trial documents of visual training in children with intermittent exotropia was conducted. Patients with intermittent exotropia were selected, simultaneous vision, fusion function, and far stereo vision with the same vision machine were measured, and near stereo vision with a stereo vision chart was measured. The number of simultaneous vision, fusion function, and distance and near stereo vision "with" and "without" cases were recorded for all patients, and the relationship with age of onset, type of strabismus, degree of strabismus, and degree of control was counted. Among them, 91 patients who underwent strabismus correction surgery were followed up for at least 6 months with correct eye position. The presence or absence of simultaneous vision, fusion function, far stereo vision, and near stereo vision were recorded and compared with preoperative. The number of recovery and nonrecovery cases was recorded, and the relationship between the age of operation, the type of strabismus, the degree of strabismus, and the degree of control was counted. It was statistically analyzed by SPSS22.0. The results of the meta-analysis showed that in terms of the effective rate of fundus lesions, the visual training group was better than the nontraining group, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (RR = 1.32, 95% CI: (1.25, 1.40),
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.