Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35313453›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2022

Survey of cancer screening practices and telehealth services among primary care physicians during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Sarah T Price, Arch G Mainous, Benjamin J Rooks

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04683744 (Facilitators and Barriers to Cancer Screening), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04683744 completednot on this map

Facilitators and Barriers to Cancer Screening: Stakeholder Perspectives on Implementation

TypeobservationalSponsorIndiana UniversityRan2021 to 2023Enrolled82ConditionsColorectal Cancer ScreeningArmsSemi-structured interviews-Patients, Semi-structured interviews-Health system
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah T PriceDepartment of Family Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Cannon Street, Suite 405 MSC 192, Charleston 29425, USA.
Arch G MainousDepartment of Community Health and Family Medicine, University of Florida, 1329 SW 16 Street 4270, Gainesville 32608, USA.
Benjamin J RooksDepartment of Health Services Research, 1225 Center Drive, University of Florida, Gainesville 32603, USA.
University of Florida · USMedical University of South Carolina · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in rapid implementation of telehealth within primary care impacting cancer screening. We sought to assess the impact of increased telehealth use on physician recommendation for cancer screenings during the COVID-19 pandemic in North America. Primary care physicians (n = 757) were surveyed in Fall 2020 through the Council of Academic Family Medicine's Educational Research Alliance (CERA) general membership survey. Respondents were asked about cancer screening practices and telehealth services during the COVID-19 pandemic. Chi-squared tests were performed to assess relationships between cancer screening practices and changes in care necessitated by the shift to telehealth services. Associations between participant responses and those reporting a diminished patient-provider relationship were assessed with multivariable logistic regression. A substantial proportion of respondents reported postponing screening for breast (34.5%), colon (32.9%), and cervical cancer (31%), and a majority (51.1%) agreed changes in care seeking will lead to increased incidence of late stage cancer. Physicians reported high use of telehealth during the pandemic, but endorsed limitations in its use to maintain cancer screening practices and the patient-provider relationship. Physicians who reported patients were afraid to come into the office were more likely to report an impaired patient-provider relationship (OR = 2.77, 95% CI: 1.33 - 7.87). Physicians who reported that telehealth maintains their patient-provider relationship were less likely to report an impaired patient-provider relationship (OR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.17 - 0.67). As telehealth becomes increasingly prominent, evaluation of the impact of telehealth on cancer screening and patient-provider relationships will be increasingly important for primary care.

Indexed as

Cancer preventionCancer screeningCovid-19Telemedicine

Identifiers

PMID35313453
PMCPMC8928753
OpenAlexW4220948831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.