ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2022
Correcting inter-scan motion artifacts in quantitative R
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reducing Motion Artifact in High Resolution 7 T MRI Using the Magnetic Resonance Minimal Motion ("MR-MinMo") Head Stabilization Device.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Evidence for divergent cortical organisation in Parkinson's disease and Lewy Body Dementia.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Parallel transmit hybrid pulse design for controlled on-resonance magnetization transfer in RMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Longitudinal reproducibility of brain and spinal cord quantitative MRI biomarkers.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Reproducible Research Practices in Magnetic Resonance Neuroimaging: A Review Informed by Advanced Language Models.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2024Review
- Correcting inter-scan motion artifacts in quantitative RMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeInter-scan motion is a substantial source of error in THEORY: The proposed methods use coil-combined magnitude images to obtain the relative coil sensitivities. The first method efficiently computes the relative sensitivities via a simple ratio; the second by fitting a more sophisticated generative model.
methods
resultsAt 3T, the proposed methods outperform the baseline method. Inter-scan motion artifacts were also reduced at 7T. However, at 7T reproducibility only converged on that of the no motion condition if position-specific transmit field effects were also incorporated.
conclusionThe proposed methods simplify inter-scan motion correction of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.