ArticleDiving and hyperbaric medicine2022
Hyperbaric oxygen treatment for refractory haemorrhagic cystitis occurring after chemotherapy and haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: retrospective analysis of 25 patients.
Article in Diving and hyperbaric medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hyperbaric oxygen therapy in a rat model of cyclophosphamide-induced hemorrhagic cystitis.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Article
- Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for chronic radiotherapy-related adverse effects: A clinically focused review.CA: a cancer journal for cliniciansReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIntractable haemorrhagic cystitis (HC) is a serious complication of chemotherapy (CT) and haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Hyperbaric oxygen treatment (HBOT) is a promising treatment option based on the similarities in injury pattern and observed histological changes with radiation induced HC, which is an approved indication. We present our experience with HBOT in HC occurring after CT and HSCT.
methodsMedical files of patients who underwent HBOT between the years 2000-2020 for HC that developed after chemotherapy and/or HSCT were reviewed. Demographic data, primary diagnosis, history of HC and details of HBOT were documented. Treatment outcomes were grouped as complete and partial healing, no response and deterioration.
resultsTwenty-five patients underwent a median of 12 HBOT sessions for HC occurring after CT and HSCT. Complete healing was observed in 11 patients whereas haematuria improved in seven patients. HC grades after HBOT were significantly better than referral grades. A significant correlation was shown with the number of HBOT sessions and change in haematuria. Patients who underwent seven or more HBOT sessions benefitted most.
conclusionsHBOT appears to be a safe and effective treatment for refractory HC following CT and HSCT. Higher quality evidence would be needed to prove efficacy. However, given the difficulty of conducting randomised controlled trials on such a vulnerable and small group of patients with few treatment options, and given the consistency of current observational evidence, HC occurring after CT and HSCT may be considered as an optional or investigational indication for HBOT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.