Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35313063›Full record

ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2022

Global evidence of persistent violations of the International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes: A systematic scoping review.

Genevieve E Becker, Paul Zambrano, Constance Ching, Jennifer Cashin, Allison Burns, Eva Policarpo, Janice Datu-Sanguyo, Roger Mathisen

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Genevieve E BeckerBEST Services, Galway City, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-7200-3169
Paul ZambranoAlive & Thrive Southeast Asia/FHI 360, Manila, Philippines.ORCID 0000-0002-9372-423X
Constance ChingAlive & Thrive Southeast Asia, FHI 360, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7006-9498
Jennifer CashinAlive & Thrive Southeast Asia, FHI 360, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8290-7906
Allison BurnsFHI 360, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9480-5288
Eva PolicarpoIndependent, Galway City, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-5702-5944
Janice Datu-SanguyoAlive & Thrive Southeast Asia/FHI 360, Manila, Philippines.ORCID 0000-0002-8919-4854
Roger MathisenAlive & Thrive Southeast Asia/FHI 360, Manila, Philippines.ORCID 0000-0002-4475-8716
Family Health International 360 · USCOPE Galway · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The influence of marketing on infant and young child feeding and health is well recognized, and an International Code was adopted by the World Health Assembly (WHA) in 1981 to reduce inappropriate marketing and protect breastfeeding. Yet the marketing and influencing continue. This scoping review systematically examined the published research evidence on the nature and extent of exposure to International Code violations from 1981 to August 2021. We used several search strategies involving multi-language databases, organization websites, citation tracking, and expert consultation, to find research items meeting our inclusion criteria. We evaluated 657 items and retained 153 studies from at least 95 countries in the review. The majority of the studies (n = 113) documenting exposure to inappropriate marketing were published since 2010. Studies reported a broad range of marketing violations targeting mothers and families, health workers, and the general public. Marketing via digital platforms and brand extension has become more frequent. The evidence shows the use of misleading and inaccurate labeling and health and nutrition claims in breach of the Code. Our review confirms that violations of the Code have not ceased and calls for renewed attention from the WHA and national governments to protect the health of children and their mothers.

Indexed as

Milk SubstitutesBreast FeedingChildFemaleGlobal HealthHumansInfantMarketingMothersbreastfeedingbreastmilk substitutescode of marketingcomplianceinfant foodinfant formulascoping review

Identifiers

PMID35313063
PMCPMC9113471
OpenAlexW4220657539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.