ArticleJournal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists2022
Accuracy of Dental and Industrial 3D Printers.
Article in Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of the Trueness and Precision of Cast, Milled-Cast, Milled, and 3D-Printed Post-and-Core Techniques Using Matching Software: An In Vitro Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Article
- Trueness of the apical and middle root portion segments of 3D-printed removable die and alveolar cast designs manufactured using stereolithographic 3D printing.Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists · 2026Article
- Precision in dentistry: how PLA 3D printing settings influence model accuracy.Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2026Article
- Effect of in-office bleaching on surface roughness of additively versus subtractively manufactured tooth-colored materials used for fixed definitive prostheses.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Surface roughness and microhardness of 3D printed denture base resins when printed with different printers.Biomaterial investigations in dentistry · 2026Article
- Impact of different levels of diastema and crowding on the precision of 3D-printed dental models: a comparative analysis using digital superimposition.Dental press journal of orthodontics · 2026Article
- TranslatingFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Balancing strength and translucency: The role of microstructure in additive and subtractive dental zirconia.Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials · 2025Article
- Comparison of manual and virtual model surgery for wafer fabrication in maxillary repositioning: an in vitro study.Head & face medicine · 2025Article
- Verifying the seating of a 3D-printed removable die using elastomeric matrices: A dental technique.Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists · 2025Article
- Dimensional Accuracy of Different Three-Dimensional Printing Models as a Function of Varying the Printing Parameters.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Cellular responses to 3D printed dental resins produced using a manufacturer recommended printer versus a third party printer.The journal of advanced prosthodontics · 2024Article
- Quality assurance of 3D-printed patient specific anatomical models: a systematic review.3D printing in medicine · 2024Article
- Effects of thermomechanical parameters on surface texture in filament materials extrusion: outlook and trends.F1000Research · 2024Review
- Effect of internal structures on the accuracy of 3D printed full-arch dentition preparation models in different printing systems.The journal of advanced prosthodontics · 2023Article
- A Critical Review of Dental Lithia-Based Glass-Ceramics.Journal of dental research · 2023Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis in vitro study evaluated the dimensional accuracy of three 3D printers and one milling machine with their respective polymeric materials using a simplified geometrical model. MATERIALS AND
methodsA simplified computer-aided design (CAD) model was created. The test samples were fabricated with three 3D printers: a dental desktop stereolithography (SLA) printer, an industrial SLA printer, and an industrial fused deposition modeling (FDM) printer, as well as a 5-axis milling machine. One polymer material was used per industrial printer and milling machine while two materials were used with the dental printer for a total of five study groups. Test specimens were then digitized using a laboratory scanner. The virtual outer caliper method was used to measure the linear dimensions of the digitized 3D printed and milled specimens in x-, y-, and z-axes, and compare them to the known values of the CAD model. Data were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA on Ranks followed by the Tukey's test.
resultsMilled specimens were not significantly different from the CAD model in any dimension (p > 0.05). All 3D printed specimens were significantly different from the CAD model in all dimensions (p = 0.01), except the dental SLA 3D printer with one of the polymers tested (Bis-GMA) which was not significantly different in two (x and z) dimensions (p = 0.4 and p = 0.12).
conclusionsThe milling technology tested provided greater dimensional accuracy than the selected 3D printing. Printer, printing technology, and material selection affected the accuracy of the printed model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.