Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35313009›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical investigation2022

Impact of COVID-19 lockdown on diabetes management and follow-up in a broad population in Spain.

Ana Palanca, Carmen Quinones-Torrelo, Juan Girbés, José T Real, F Javier Ampudia-Blasco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical investigation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on HbA1c Testing: Prioritization of High-Risk Cases and Impact of Social Deprivation.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ana PalancaEndocrinology and Nutrition Department, Valencia University Clinic Hospital, Valencia, Spain.
Carmen Quinones-TorreloLaboratory of Biochemistry and Molecular Pathology, Valencia University Clinic Hospital, Valencia, Spain.
Juan GirbésDiabetes Unit, Arnau de Vilanova Hospital, Valencia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1665-4549
José T RealEndocrinology and Nutrition Department, Valencia University Clinic Hospital, Valencia, Spain.
F Javier Ampudia-BlascoEndocrinology and Nutrition Department, Valencia University Clinic Hospital, Valencia, Spain.

Funding

Ana Palanca holds a fellowship from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid Rio Hortega Program CM19/00027
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate the impact of COVID-19 lockdown on glycaemic control and diabetes follow-up in a Spanish metropolitan area with a total general population of 340,000.

methodsA retrospective real-world study comparing HbA1c testing, an indicator of diabetes control, and mean HbA1c during different COVID-19 restriction periods in 2020 (full lockdown, post-lockdown, partial lockdown) with the same periods in 2019. HbA1c testing was analysed per study period and according to gender, age and clinical setting. Associations between HbA1c testing and different covariables were investigated using logistic regression analysis. Changes in HbA1c were evaluated by repeated measures multivariate analysis of variance (ANOVA).

resultsDuring full lockdown, 6847 individuals, of which 56.7% were over 65 and 6.5% below 40, were tested for HbA1c compared to 14,180 in 2019 (OR 0.47, 95% CI:0.46-0.49). Reduction in HbA1c testing was greater among older individuals (OR 0.44, 95% CI:0.42-0.45). No differences were observed for post-lockdown (OR 1.01, 95% CI:0.99-1.04). During partial lockdown, 10,816 individuals had at least one HbA1c measured compared to 12,749 in 2019 (OR 0.84, 95% CI:0.82-0.87). Mean HbA1c during full lockdown was 7.26% (±1.06) compared to 7.50% (±1.14) in 2019 (p < .0001). For gender and across all age groups, HbA1c levels were lower during full lockdown. HbA1c changes were not significantly different during post-lockdown and partial lockdown.

conclusionsCOVID-19 restriction measures affected HbA1c testing. During complete lockdown, HbA1c testing decreased by half across all gender and age groups. No deleterious effect on glycaemic control was observed during lockdown and post-lockdown among those tested.

Indexed as

COVID-19Diabetes MellitusBlood GlucoseCommunicable Disease ControlFollow-Up StudiesGlycated HemoglobinHumansRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2SpainBlood GlucoseGlycated HemoglobinCOVID-19diabetes controlHbA1clockdown

Identifiers

PMID35313009
PMCPMC9111861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.