Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35312823›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2022

Cluster analysis demonstrates co-existing sites of fragility fracture and associated comorbidities.

M Dey, M Bukhari

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Capacitive biophysical stimulation improves the healing of vertebral fragility fractures: a prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2024
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M DeyInstitute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, L69 3BX, UK. Mrinalini.dey@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6858-4338
M BukhariDepartment of Rheumatology, Royal Lancaster Infirmary, University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay, Lancaster, LA1 4RP, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4311-5222
Royal Lancaster Infirmary · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We undertook cluster analysis in 11,003 patients who had sustained ≥ 1 fragility fracture, to find associations between fracture sites and comorbidities. We identified three distinct groups of fracture sites and four clusters of fractures and comorbidities. Knowledge of factors associated with fracture sites will aid prophylaxis in at-risk patients.

introductionFragility fracture (FF) prevalence is increasing. Subsequent fractures lead to greater morbidity and mortality. Few data are available on the association between FF sites and comorbidities.

objectives1. Establish the most common sites of FF and clusters within patients. 2. Identify patterns of co-existing FF and associated comorbidities.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed clinical records of patients undergoing bone mineral density estimation at a district hospital in North-West England, 2004-2016, identifying those who had sustained ≥ 1 FF. Demographics, FF site(s), comorbidities, and medications were recorded. Cluster analysis was performed on fracture sites alone, and sites and comorbidities, using Jaccard similarity coefficient. Results were plotted on a dendrogram and divided into clusters.

resultsOf 28,868 patients, 11,003 had sustained ≥ 1 FF, 84.6% female, with overall mean age 67.5 years and median T-score - 1.12 SD. FF of the forearm was more frequent (n = 5045), most commonly co-existing with tibia/fibula fractures. Three FF site clusters were identified: ankle and elbow; forearm, tibia/fibula, ribs and spine; and pelvis, femur and humerus. When including comorbidities, four clusters were identified: forearm, tibia/fibula, spine, associated with family history of FF, smoking, corticosteroids and bisphosphonates; pelvis associated with hyperparathyroidism, PMR, coeliac disease and HRT; femur and humerus associated with IBD and RA; and ribs associated with alcohol and hyperthyroidism.

conclusionCluster analysis demonstrated three fracture site clusters, and four subgroups of FF sites and comorbidities. Cluster analysis is a novel method to evaluate comorbidities associated with FF sites. Knowledge of factors associated with FF sites will aid prophylaxis in at-risk patients.

Indexed as

Fractures, BoneOsteoporotic FracturesAgedBone DensityCluster AnalysisDiphosphonatesFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesDiphosphonatesComorbiditiesFragility fractureMultimorbidityOsteoporosisRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID35312823
OpenAlexW4221039877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.