Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35312808›Full record

ArticleMicrobial ecology2023

Genomic Comparisons of Two Armillaria Species with Different Ecological Behaviors and Their Associated Soil Microbial Communities.

Jorge R Ibarra Caballero, Bradley M Lalande, John W Hanna, Ned B Klopfenstein, Mee-Sook Kim, Jane E Stewart

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial ecology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Aerolysin-like proteins fromFrontiers in fungal biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  10. The role of symbiotic fungi in the life cycle ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jorge R Ibarra Caballero *Department of Agricultural Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.
Bradley M Lalande *Department of Agricultural Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.
John W HannaRocky Mountain Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Moscow, ID, 83843, USA.
Ned B KlopfensteinRocky Mountain Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Moscow, ID, 83843, USA. ned.klopfenstein@usda.gov.
Mee-Sook KimPacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA. meesook.kim@usda.gov.
Jane E StewartDepartment of Agricultural Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA. jane.stewart@colostate.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Armillaria species show considerable variation in ecological roles and virulence, from mycorrhizae and saprophytes to important root pathogens of trees and horticultural crops. We studied two Armillaria species that can be found in coniferous forests of northwestern USA and southwestern Canada. Armillaria altimontana not only is considered as a weak, opportunistic pathogen of coniferous trees, but it also appears to exhibit in situ biological control against A. solidipes, formerly North American A. ostoyae, which is considered a virulent pathogen of coniferous trees. Here, we describe their genome assemblies and present a functional annotation of the predicted genes and proteins for the two Armillaria species that exhibit contrasting ecological roles. In addition, the soil microbial communities were examined in association with the two Armillaria species within a 45-year-old plantation of western white pine (Pinus monticola) in northern Idaho, USA, where A. altimontana was associated with improved tree growth and survival, while A. solidipes was associated with reduced growth and survival. The results from this study reveal a high similarity between the genomes of the beneficial/non-pathogenic A. altimontana and pathogenic A. solidipes; however, many relatively small differences in gene content were identified that could contribute to differences in ecological lifestyles and interactions with woody hosts and soil microbial communities.

Indexed as

ArmillariaPinusTracheophytaForestsGenomicsSoilTreesSoilArmillaria root diseaseBeneficial fungiDysbiosisGenomesPathogenicTree health

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.