ArticleDer Unfallchirurg2022
[Evaluation of the current research structures in trauma surgery : A survey of the scientific committee of the German Society for Trauma Surgery].
Article in Der Unfallchirurg, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Research in orthopaedic trauma surgery: approaches of basic scientists and clinicians and the relevance of interprofessional research teams.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo improve research in orthopedics and traumatology (O&T) in Germany, the implementation of comprehensive research collaborations and enhanced communication pathways among different institutions are necessary. This survey was initiated to collect data regarding the current research structures in O&T. MATERIAL AND
methodsA subject-specific questionnaire was sent via email to collect data regarding demographics, on-going and past research activities and the funding. Naming of current and future research topics and problems regarding realization of projects were determined. All results were submitted electronically, anonymously and voluntarily.
resultsOf 229 participants, 83% worked as clinicians and 59.6% of the participants were working in departments with joint structures (O&T). Industry and universities were found to be the essential funding sources. Future research topics tend to concentrate on digital health issues (artificial intelligence, big data, 3D-printing). Resource scarcity in time and staff as well as administrative barriers but also insufficient funding were identified as major impediments of research activity.
conclusionFuture research development in O&T will cause an expansion of techniques and methods. At the same time aggravated personnel, financial, administrative and legal framework conditions can only be managed with an intensively increased effort. Cooperation projects and collaborative research structures might be a solution to these challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35312796What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.