Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35312791›Full record

SynthesisEuropean radiology2022

A systematic review of the incidence of hypersensitivity reactions and post-contrast acute kidney injury after ioversol: part 2-intra-arterial administration.

Aart J van der Molen, Ilona A Dekkers, Ibrahim Bedioune, Elisabeth Darmon-Kern

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Aart J van der MolenContrast Media Safety Research Group, Department of Radiology C-2S, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, NL-2333, ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands. a.j.van_der_molen@lumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2376-9424
Ilona A DekkersContrast Media Safety Research Group, Department of Radiology C-2S, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, NL-2333, ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Ibrahim BediouneClinical Development Department, Guerbet, Roissy CDG Cedex, France.
Elisabeth Darmon-KernClinical Development Department, Guerbet, Roissy CDG Cedex, France.
Guerbet (France) · FRLeiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), including hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) and post-contrast acute kidney injury (PC-AKI), after intra-arterial (IA) administration of ioversol. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A systematic literature search was performed (1980-2021) and studies documenting IA use of ioversol, and reporting safety outcomes were selected. Key information on study design, patients' characteristics, indication, dose, and type of safety outcome were extracted.

resultsTwenty-eight studies (including two pediatric studies) with 8373 patients exposed to IA ioversol were selected. Studies were highly heterogenous in terms of design, PC-AKI definition, and studied population. PC-AKI incidence after coronary angiography was 7.5-21.9% in a general population, 4.0-26.4% in diabetic patients, and 5.5-28.9% in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). PC-AKI requiring dialysis was rare and reported mainly in patients with severe CKD. No significant differences in PC-AKI rates were shown in studies comparing different iodinated contrast media (ICM). Based on seven studies of ioversol clinical development, the overall ADR incidence was 1.6%, comparable to that reported with other non-ionic ICM. Pediatric data were scarce with only one study reporting on PC-AKI incidence (12%), and one reporting on ADR incidence (0.09%), both after coronary angiography.

conclusionsAfter ioversol IA administration, PC-AKI incidence was highly variable between studies, likely reflecting the heterogeneity of the included study populations, and appeared comparable to that reported with other ICM. The rate of other ADRs appears to be low. Well-designed studies are needed for a better comparison with other ICM. KEY POINTS: • PC-AKI incidence after IA administration of ioversol appears to be comparable to that of other ICM, despite the high variability between studies. • The need for dialysis after IA administration of ioversol is rare. • No obvious difference was found regarding the safety profile of ioversol between IA and IV administration.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryIodine CompoundsRenal Insufficiency, ChronicChildContrast MediaHumansIncidenceRisk FactorsTriiodobenzoic AcidsContrast MediaIodine CompoundsioversolTriiodobenzoic AcidsAcute kidney injuryContrast mediaDrug-related side effects and adverse reactionsInjections, intra-arterialIoversol

Identifiers

PMID35312791
PMCPMC9279267
OpenAlexW4220924936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.