Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35312788›Full record

Trial reportTranslational behavioral medicine2022

Integrating a physical activity coaching intervention into diabetes care: a mixed-methods evaluation of a pilot pragmatic trial.

Amy G Huebschmann, Russell E Glasgow, Ian M Leavitt, Kristi Chapman, John D Rice, Steven Lockhart, Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley, Jane E B Reusch, Andrea L Dunn, Judith G Regensteiner

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Translational behavioral medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Amy G HuebschmannDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado (CU) School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9329-3142
Russell E GlasgowCU Adult and Child Consortium of Outcomes Research and Delivery Scienc, Aurora, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4218-3231
Ian M LeavittUniversity of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Houston, TX, USA.
Kristi ChapmanDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado (CU) School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
John D RiceColorado School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, Aurora, CO, USA.
Steven LockhartCU Adult and Child Consortium of Outcomes Research and Delivery Scienc, Aurora, CO, USA.
Jennifer E Stevens-LapsleyCU Physical Therapy Program, Aurora, CO, USA.
Jane E B ReuschCU Ludeman Family Center for Women's Health Research, Aurora, CO, USA.
Andrea L DunnKlein-Buendel, Inc. (Retired Senior Scientist Emeritus), Golden, CO, USA.
Judith G RegensteinerDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado (CU) School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.

Funding

PILOT STUDY--SUBSTRATE METABOLISM IN EXTREMELY LOW BIRTH WEIGHT INFANTSP30DK048520 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Edward L Melanson · 1995 to 2026
$32.6M
Targeting Physical Activity to Improve Cardiovascular Health in Type 2 DiabetesK23HL118133 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI HUEBSCHMANN, AMY GROTELUESCHEN · 2014 to 2017
$615k
Cardiovascular Mechanisms of Exercise Intolerance in Diabetes and the Role of SexI01CX001532 · VA · VA EASTERN COLORADO HEALTH CARE SYSTEM · PI REUSCH, JANE E · 2017 to 2022
–
CSRD VA I01 CX001532NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL118133NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK048520NIH HHS K23 HL118133
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical activity (PA) counseling is under-utilized in primary care for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D), despite improving important health outcomes, including physical function. We adapted evidence-based PA counseling programs to primary care patients, staff, and leader's needs, resulting in "Be ACTIVE" comprised of shared PA tracker data (FitBit©), six theory-informed PA coaching calls, and three in-person clinician visits. In a pilot randomized pragmatic trial, we evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of Be ACTIVE. Sedentary patients with T2D were randomized to Be ACTIVE versus an enhanced control condition. Mixed methods assessments of feasibility and acceptability included costs. Objective pilot effectiveness outcomes included PA (primary outcome, accelerometer steps/week), the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) physical function measure, and behavioral PA predictors. Fifty patients were randomized to Be ACTIVE or control condition. Acceptability was >90% for patients and clinic staff. Coaching and PA tracking costs of ~$90/patient met Medicare reimbursement criteria. Pre-post PA increased by ~11% (Be ACTIVE) and ~6% in controls (group difference: 1574 ± 4391 steps/week, p = .72). As compared to controls, Be ACTIVE participants significantly improved SPPB (0.9 ± 0.3 vs. -0.1 ± 0.3, p = .01, changes >0.5 points prevent falls clinically), and PA predictors of self-efficacy (p = .02) and social-environmental support (p < .01). In this pilot trial, Be ACTIVE was feasible and highly acceptable to stakeholders and yielded significant improvements in objective physical function consistent with lower fall risk, whereas PA changes were less than anticipated. Be ACTIVE may need additional adaptation or a longer duration to improve PA outcomes.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2MentoringAgedExerciseFeasibility StudiesHumansMedicareUnited StatesacceptabilityImplementationPhysical activityPhysical functionPrimary careType 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID35312788
PMCPMC9150080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.