Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35312470›Full record

ArticleSexual and reproductive health matters2021

Supporting contraceptive choice in self-care: qualitative exploration of beliefs and attitudes towards emergency contraceptive pills and on-demand use in Accra, Ghana and Lusaka, Zambia.

Amanda Kalamar, Christine Bixiones, Grace Jaworski, Klaira Lerma, Melvin Mwansa, Rachel Lawreh, Selase Adjei

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexual and reproductive health matters, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Centring rights-based access to self-care interventions.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Amanda KalamarSenior Research Advisor, Population Services International, Washington, DC, USA.
Christine BixionesSenior Technical Advisor, Population Services International, Washington, DC, USA. Correspondence: christine.bixiones@gmail.com.
Grace JaworskiResearch Advisor, Population Services International, Washington, DC, USA.
Klaira LermaResearch Associate, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Melvin MwansaProject Manager, Society for Family Health, Lusaka, Zambia.
Rachel LawrehResearch Officer, Total Family Health Organization, Accra, Ghana.
Selase AdjeiResearch, Monitoring, and Evaluation Coordinator, Total Family Health Organization, Accra, Ghana.
Population Services International · USGhana Health Service · GHStanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Supporting women to use emergency contraceptive pills (ECPs) as both a back-up and a regular, on-demand contraceptive method can increase self-managed contraceptive options and enhance reproductive autonomy, particularly for vulnerable populations. ECPs are currently regulated for use in an "emergency" situation; however, some evidence suggests that women also value this method as a regular, on-demand option used to prevent pregnancy with foresight and confidence. Beliefs and attitudes towards ECPs and their on-demand use in Accra, Ghana and Lusaka, Zambia were explored through in-depth interviews (IDIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs) with women ages 18-34 and men ages 18-30 in Accra and Lusaka. Structured interview guides and focus group discussion guides were used to explore societal and community norms, knowledge, behaviour, and attitudes. IDIs were analysed using deductive, thematic coding, and FGDs were analysed using inductive, thematic coding. Three major themes emerged: first, ECPs are a trusted method and often preferred as an easy and effective option; second, people value ECPs as an on-demand method, yet fear that repeated use could have harmful health effects; finally, anticipated stigma among users of ECPs is higher than experienced stigma, except among young women. The findings that emerged from this research suggest that the repositioning of ECPs as suitable for on-demand use would be an important step towards reducing the stigma and discrimination that is often associated with the method while expanding the range of self-care contraceptive options available to meet the differing needs of women, young women and vulnerable populations.

Indexed as

Contraceptives, PostcoitalAdolescentAdultContraceptive AgentsFemaleGhanaHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMalePregnancySelf CareYoung AdultZambiaContraceptive AgentsContraceptives, Postcoitaladolescentsemergency contraceptionon-demandself-careself-managed carestigma

Identifiers

PMID35312470
PMCPMC8942546
OpenAlexW4220810198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.