Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35312467›Full record

SynthesisSexual and reproductive health matters2021

Self-administration of gender-affirming hormones: a systematic review of effectiveness, cost, and values and preferences of end-users and health workers.

Caitlin E Kennedy, Ping Teresa Yeh, Jack Byrne, L Leigh Ann van der Merwe, Laura Ferguson, Tonia Poteat, Manjulaa Narasimhan

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sexual and reproductive health matters, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Centring rights-based access to self-care interventions.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Caitlin E KennedyAssociate Professor, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6820-063X
Ping Teresa YehResearch Associate, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7425-0382
Jack ByrneCo-investigator, Counting Ourselves, Trans Health Research Lab, the Aotearoa New Zealand Trans and Non-binary Health Survey, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
L Leigh Ann van der MerweFounder/Director & Research Lead, Social, Health and Empowerment Feminist Collective of Transgender Women of Africa, East London, South Africa.
Laura FergusonAssistant Professor, Institute on Inequalities in Global Health, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1340-793X
Tonia PoteatAssociate Professor, Department of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6541-3787
Manjulaa NarasimhanScientist, Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, includes the UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction - HRP, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0598-6887

Funding

Research Services CoreP2CHD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KAREN B GUZZO · 2015 to 2026
$9.6M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD050924World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-administration of quality gender-affirming hormones is one approach to expanding access to hormone therapy for individuals seeking secondary sex characteristics more aligned with their gender identity or expression and can be empowering when provided within safe, supportive health systems. To inform World Health Organization guidelines on self-care interventions, we systematically reviewed the evidence for self-administration compared to health worker-administration of gender-affirming hormones. We conducted a comprehensive search for peer-reviewed articles and conference abstracts that addressed effectiveness, values and preferences, and cost considerations. Data were extracted in duplicate using standardised forms. Of 3792 unique references, five values and preferences articles were included; no studies met the criteria for the effectiveness or cost reviews. All values and preferences studies focused on self-administration of unprescribed hormones, not prescribed hormones within a supportive health system. Four studies from the U.S. (

Indexed as

Transgender PersonsTranssexualismCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleGender IdentityHormonesHumansMaleHormonesgender-affirming hormone therapyself-administrationself-caresystematic reviewtransgender healthvalues and preferences

Identifiers

PMID35312467
PMCPMC8942532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.