Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35312362›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Enhancement of speech-in-noise comprehension through vibrotactile stimulation at the syllabic rate.

Pierre Guilleminot, Tobias Reichenbach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Top-Down Attention Modulates Phase Effects on Audio-Tactile Processing.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Cutaneous Alternating Current Stimulation Can Cause a Phasic Modulation of Speech Perception.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Can youImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pierre GuilleminotDepartment of Bioengineering, South Kensington Campus, Imperial College London, London SW7 2BX, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0773-7254
Tobias ReichenbachDepartment of Bioengineering, South Kensington Campus, Imperial College London, London SW7 2BX, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

SignificanceSyllables are important building blocks of speech. They occur at a rate between 4 and 8 Hz, corresponding to the theta frequency range of neural activity in the cerebral cortex. When listening to speech, the theta activity becomes aligned to the syllabic rhythm, presumably aiding in parsing a speech signal into distinct syllables. However, this neural activity cannot only be influenced by sound, but also by somatosensory information. Here, we show that the presentation of vibrotactile signals at the syllabic rate can enhance the comprehension of speech in background noise. We further provide evidence that this multisensory enhancement of speech comprehension reflects the multisensory integration of auditory and tactile information in the auditory cortex.

Indexed as

Auditory CortexSpeech PerceptionAcoustic StimulationComprehensionSpeechaudiotactile integrationEEGmultisensory processingspeech-in-noise comprehension

Identifiers

PMID35312362
PMCPMC9060510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.