Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35312162›Full record

Observational studyCancer medicine2022

BRCA1/2 testing among young women with breast cancer in Massachusetts, 2010-2013: An observational study using state cancer registry and All-Payer claims data.

Lydia E Pace, John Z Ayanian, Robert E Wolf, Richard Knowlton, Susan T Gershman, Summer Sherburne Hawkins, Nancy L Keating

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Cancer medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Frontiers in oncology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lydia E PaceBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5378-0296
John Z AyanianInstitute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Robert E WolfHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Richard KnowltonMassachusetts Cancer Registry, Office of Data Management and Outcomes Assessment, Office of Population Health, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Susan T GershmanMassachusetts Cancer Registry, Office of Data Management and Outcomes Assessment, Office of Population Health, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Summer Sherburne HawkinsBoston College School of Social Work, Newton, Massachusetts, USA.
Nancy L KeatingBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

Linking State Registry and All Payer Claims Data to Study Cancer CareR21CA172892 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI AYANIAN, JOHN Z., WEISSMAN, JOEL S. · 2013 to 2015
$419k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA172892
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTesting for BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants is recommended for women aged ≤45 years with breast cancer. Some studies have found racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in testing. We linked Massachusetts' All-Payer Claims Database with Massachusetts Cancer Registry data to assess factors associated with BRCA1/2 testing among young women with breast cancer in Massachusetts, a state with high levels of access to care and equitable insurance coverage of breast cancer gene (BRCA) testing.

methodsWe identified breast cancer diagnoses in the Massachusetts Cancer Registry from 2010 to 2013 and linked registry data with Massachusetts All-Payer Claims Data from 2010 to 2014 among women aged ≤45 years with private insurance or Medicaid. We used multivariable logistic regression to examine factors associated with BRCA1/2 testing within 6 months of diagnosis.

resultsThe study population included 2424 women; 80.3% were identified as non-Hispanic White, 6.4% non-Hispanic Black, and 6.3% Hispanic. Overall, 54.9% received BRCA1/2 testing within 6 months of breast cancer diagnosis. In adjusted analyses, non-Hispanic Black women had less than half the odds of testing compared with non-Hispanic White women (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.31, 0.64). Medicaid-insured women had half the odds of testing compared with privately-insured women (OR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.41, 0.63). Living in lower-income areas was also associated with lower odds of testing. Having an academically-affiliated oncology clinician was not associated with testing.

conclusionSocioeconomic and racial/ethnic disparities exist in BRCA1/2 testing among women with breast cancer in Massachusetts, despite equitable insurance coverage of testing. Further research should examine whether disparities have persisted with growing testing awareness and availability over time.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHumansInsurance CoverageMassachusettsMass ScreeningRacial GroupsRegistriesBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanBRCA1/2breast cancerdisparitiesMassachusettsMedicaid

Identifiers

PMID35312162
PMCPMC9249986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.