Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35311972›Full record

ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2022

N-terminal and mid-region tau fragments as fluid biomarkers in neurological diseases.

Anniina Snellman, Juan Lantero-Rodriguez, Andreja Emeršič, Agathe Vrillon, Thomas K Karikari, Nicholas J Ashton, Milica Gregorič Kramberger, Saša Čučnik, Claire Paquet, Uroš Rot and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Plasma N-terminal tau fragment is an amyloid-dependent biomarker in Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Analytical and clinical performance of eight SimoaAlzheimer's research & therapy · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Anniina SnellmanDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6191-0954
Juan Lantero-RodriguezDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.
Andreja EmeršičDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Agathe VrillonUniversité de Paris, Cognitive Neurology Center, GHU Nord APHP Hospital Lariboisière Fernand Widal, Paris, France.
Thomas K KarikariDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1422-4358
Nicholas J AshtonDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.
Milica Gregorič KrambergerDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Saša ČučnikDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Claire PaquetUniversité de Paris, Cognitive Neurology Center, GHU Nord APHP Hospital Lariboisière Fernand Widal, Paris, France.
Uroš RotDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Henrik ZetterbergDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3930-4354
Kaj BlennowDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.
University of Ljubljana · SIInserm · FRSahlgrenska University Hospital · SEKing's College London · GBUniversity of Gothenburg · SEUniversity of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Turku · FI

Funding

The effects of iron on oxidative stress and Alzheimer's biomarkers in amyloid-positive and negative elderly normalR01AG068398 · NIA · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI CHIANG, GLORIA CHIA-YI · 2020 to 2024
$2.8M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG068398
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain-derived tau secreted into CSF and blood consists of different N-terminal and mid-domain fragments, which may have a differential temporal course and thus, biomarker potential across the Alzheimer's disease continuum or in other neurological diseases. While current clinically validated total tau assays target mid-domain epitopes, comparison of these assays with new biomarkers targeting N-terminal epitopes using the same analytical platform may be important to increase the understanding of tau pathophysiology. We developed three total tau immunoassays targeting specific N-terminal (NTA and NTB total tau) or mid-region (MR total tau) epitopes, using single molecule array technology. After analytical validation, the diagnostic performance of these biomarkers was evaluated in CSF and compared with the Innotest total tau (and as proof of concept, with N-p-tau181 and N-p-tau217) in three clinical cohorts (n = 342 total). The cohorts included participants across the Alzheimer's disease continuum (n = 276), other dementias (n = 22), Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (n = 24), acute neurological disorders (n = 18) and progressive supranuclear palsy (n = 22). Furthermore, we evaluated all three new total tau biomarkers in plasma (n = 44) and replicated promising findings with NTA total tau in another clinical cohort (n = 50). In CSF, all total tau biomarkers were increased in Alzheimer's disease compared with controls (P < 0.0001) and correlated with each other (rs = 0.53-0.95). NTA and NTB total tau, but not other total tau assays, distinguished amyloid-positive and amyloid-negative mild cognitive impairment with high accuracies (AUCs 84% and 82%, P < 0.001) matching N-p-tau217 (AUC 83%; DeLong test P = 0.93 and 0.88). All total tau assays were excellent in differentiating Alzheimer's disease from other dementias (P < 0.001, AUCs 89-100%). In Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and acute neurological disorders, N-terminal total tau biomarkers had significantly higher fold changes versus controls in CSF (45-133-fold increase) than Innotest or MR total tau (11-42-fold increase, P < 0.0001 for all). In progressive supranuclear palsy, CSF concentrations of all total tau biomarkers were similar to those in controls. Plasma NTA total tau concentrations were increased in Alzheimer's disease compared with controls in two independent cohorts (P = 0.0056 and 0.0033), while Quanterix total tau performed poorly (P = 0.55 and 0.44). Taken together, N-terminal-directed CSF total tau biomarkers increase ahead of standard total tau alternatives in the Alzheimer's disease continuum, increase to higher degrees in Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and acute neurological diseases and show better potential than Quanterix total tau as Alzheimer's disease blood biomarkers. For progressive supranuclear palsy, other tau biomarkers should continue to be investigated.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCreutzfeldt-Jakob SyndromeNervous System DiseasesSupranuclear Palsy, ProgressiveAmyloid beta-PeptidesBiomarkersEpitopesHumansPeptide Fragmentstau ProteinsAmyloid beta-PeptidesBiomarkersEpitopesPeptide Fragmentstau ProteinsAlzheimer’s diseasebiomarkercerebrospinal fluidplasmatau

Identifiers

PMID35311972
PMCPMC9420020
OpenAlexW4206179494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.