Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35311964›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2022

Incorporating Polygenic Risk Scores and Nongenetic Risk Factors for Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Among Asian Women.

Yaohua Yang, Ran Tao, Xiang Shu, Qiuyin Cai, Wanqing Wen, Kai Gu, Yu-Tang Gao, Ying Zheng, Sun-Seog Kweon, Min-Ho Shin and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Epidemiology, early detection, and management of breast cancer in China: A comprehensive review.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Development of a Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Model Incorporating Polygenic Risk Scores and Nongenetic Risk Factors for Korean Women.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

Yaohua YangDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Ran TaoDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Xiang ShuDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Qiuyin CaiDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Wanqing WenDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Kai GuShanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai Institutes of Preventive Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yu-Tang GaoState Key Laboratory of Oncogene and Related Genes and Department of Epidemiology, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Ying ZhengDepartment of Cancer Prevention, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Sun-Seog KweonDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hwasun, South Korea.
Min-Ho ShinDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hwasun, South Korea.
Ji-Yeob ChoiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Eun-Sook LeeNational Cancer Center Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, Goyang, South Korea.
Sun-Young KongNational Cancer Center Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, Goyang, South Korea.
Boyoung ParkResearch Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea.
Min Ho ParkDepartment of Surgery, Chonnam National University Medical School & Hospital, Hwasun, South Korea.
Guochong JiaDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Bingshan LiDepartment of Molecular Physiology & Biophysics, Vanderbilt Genetics Institute, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Daehee KangDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Xiao-Ou ShuDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Jirong LongDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Wei ZhengDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · USChonnam National University Hwasun Hospital · KRNational Cancer Center · KRMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USSeoul National University · KRFudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CNShanghai Municipal Center For Disease Control Prevention · CNState Key Laboratory of Oncogene and Related Genes · CNVanderbilt University · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Integrating genomic and transcriptomic data to identify breast cancer susceptibility genesR01CA235553 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI LONG, JIRONG, ZHENG, WEI · 2019 to 2024
$3.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA235553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) have shown promise in breast cancer risk prediction; however, limited studies have been conducted among Asian women. Objective: To develop breast cancer risk prediction models for Asian women incorporating PRSs and nongenetic risk factors. Design, Setting, and Participants: This diagnostic study included women of Asian ancestry from the Asia Breast Cancer Consortium. PRSs were developed using data from genomewide association studies (GWASs) of breast cancer conducted among 123 041 women with Asian ancestry (including 18 650 women with breast cancer) using 3 approaches: (1) reported PRS for women with European ancestry; (2) breast cancer-associated single-nucleotide variations (SNVs) identified by fine-mapping of GWAS-identified risk loci; and (3) genomewide risk prediction algorithms. A nongenetic risk score (NGRS) was built, including 7 well-established nongenetic risk factors, using data of 416 case participants and 1558 control participants from a prospective cohort study. PRSs were initially validated in an independent data set including 1426 case participants and 1323 control participants and further evaluated, along with the NGRS, in the second data set including 368 case participants and 736 control participants nested within a prospective cohort study. Main Outcomes and Measures: Logistic regression was used to examine associations of risk scores with breast cancer risk to estimate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: A total of 126 894 women of Asian ancestry were included; 20 444 (16.1%) had breast cancer. The mean (SD) age ranged from 49.1 (10.8) to 54.4 (10.4) years for case participants and 50.6 (9.5) to 54.0 (7.4) years for control participants among studies that provided demographic characteristics. In the prospective cohort, a PRS with 111 SNVs developed using the fine-mapping approach (PRS111) showed a prediction performance comparable with a genomewide PRS that included more than 855 000 SNVs. The OR per SD increase of PRS111 score was 1.67 (95% CI, 1.46-1.92), with an AUC of 0.639 (95% CI, 0.604-0.674). The NGRS had a limited predictive ability (AUC, 0.565; 95% CI, 0.529-0.601). Compared with the average risk group (40th-60th percentile), women in the top 5% of PRS111 and NGRS were at a 3.84-fold (95% CI, 2.30-6.46) and 2.10-fold (95% CI, 1.22-3.62) higher risk of breast cancer, respectively. The prediction model including both PRS111 and NGRS achieved the highest prediction accuracy (AUC, 0.648; 95% CI, 0.613-0.682). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, PRSs derived using breast cancer risk-associated SNVs had similar predictive performance in Asian and European women. Including nongenetic risk factors in models further improved prediction accuracy. These findings support the utility of these models in developing personalized screening and prevention strategies.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAsian PeopleFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID35311964
PMCPMC8938714
OpenAlexW4220701527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.