Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35311962›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2022

Utility of the Simulated Outcomes Following Carotid Artery Laceration Video Data Set for Machine Learning Applications.

Guillaume Kugener, Dhiraj J Pangal, Tyler Cardinal, Casey Collet, Elizabeth Lechtholz-Zey, Sasha Lasky, Shivani Sundaram, Nicholas Markarian, Yichao Zhu, Arman Roshannai and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Guillaume KugenerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Dhiraj J PangalDepartment of Neurosurgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Tyler CardinalDepartment of Neurosurgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Casey ColletDepartment of Neurosurgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Elizabeth Lechtholz-ZeyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Sasha LaskyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Shivani SundaramDepartment of Neurosurgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Nicholas MarkarianDepartment of Neurosurgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Yichao ZhuDepartment of Computer Science, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Arman RoshannaiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Aditya SinhaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
X Y HanDepartment of Operations Research and Information Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
Vardan PapyanDepartment of Mathematics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Andrew HungCenter for Robotic Simulation and Education, USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Animashree AnandkumarDepartment of Computer Science and Mathematics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena.
Bozena WrobelDepartment of Otolaryngology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Gabriel ZadaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Daniel A DonohoDivision of Neurosurgery, Center for Neuroscience, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC.
University of Southern California · USCalifornia Institute of Technology · USCornell University · USJefferson Hospital for Neuroscience · USUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Mentored Career DevelopmentKL2TR001854 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Elizabeth Rhea Erwin Burner, Amy Elizabeth West · 2016 to 2026
$9.0M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001854
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Surgical data scientists lack video data sets that depict adverse events, which may affect model generalizability and introduce bias. Hemorrhage may be particularly challenging for computer vision-based models because blood obscures the scene. Objective: To assess the utility of the Simulated Outcomes Following Carotid Artery Laceration (SOCAL)-a publicly available surgical video data set of hemorrhage complication management with instrument annotations and task outcomes-to provide benchmarks for surgical data science techniques, including computer vision instrument detection, instrument use metrics and outcome associations, and validation of a SOCAL-trained neural network using real operative video. Design, Setting, and Participants: For this quailty improvement study, a total of 75 surgeons with 1 to 30 years' experience (mean, 7 years) were filmed from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2020, managing catastrophic surgical hemorrhage in a high-fidelity cadaveric training exercise at nationwide training courses. Videos were annotated from January 1 to June 30, 2021. Interventions: Surgeons received expert coaching between 2 trials. Main Outcomes and Measures: Hemostasis within 5 minutes (task success, dichotomous), time to hemostasis (in seconds), and blood loss (in milliliters) were recorded. Deep neural networks (DNNs) were trained to detect surgical instruments in view. Model performance was measured using mean average precision (mAP), sensitivity, and positive predictive value. Results: SOCAL contains 31 443 frames with 65 071 surgical instrument annotations from 147 trials with associated surgeon demographic characteristics, time to hemostasis, and recorded blood loss for each trial. Computer vision-based instrument detection methods using DNNs trained on SOCAL achieved a mAP of 0.67 overall and 0.91 for the most common surgical instrument (suction). Hemorrhage control challenges standard object detectors: detection of some surgical instruments remained poor (mAP, 0.25). On real intraoperative video, the model achieved a sensitivity of 0.77 and a positive predictive value of 0.96. Instrument use metrics derived from the SOCAL video were significantly associated with performance (blood loss). Conclusions and Relevance: Hemorrhage control is a high-stakes adverse event that poses unique challenges for video analysis, but no data sets of hemorrhage control exist. The use of SOCAL, the first data set to depict hemorrhage control, allows the benchmarking of data science applications, including object detection, performance metric development, and identification of metrics associated with outcomes. In the future, SOCAL may be used to build and validate surgical data science models.

Indexed as

LacerationsSurgeonsCarotid ArteriesHumansMachine LearningNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID35311962
PMCPMC8938712
OpenAlexW4221062579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.