Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35311930›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2022

Use and Perceptions of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems by Older Drivers With and Without Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Rebecca A Deffler, Jing Xu, Ava K Bittner, Alex R Bowers, Shirin E Hassan, Nicole Ross, San-San L Cooley, Aprile Doubt, Frederick H Davidorf, Bradley E Dougherty and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Rebecca A DefflerCollege of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Jing XuEnvision Research Institute, Wichita, KS, USA.
Ava K BittnerStein Eye Institute, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Alex R BowersSchepens Eye Research Institute of Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA, USA.
Shirin E HassanSchool of Optometry, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Nicole RossNew England College of Optometry, Boston, MA, USA.
San-San L CooleyCollege of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Aprile DoubtCollege of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Frederick H DavidorfDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Bradley E DoughertyCollege of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
RADARS Study Group

Funding

The OSU Center for Clinical and Translational Science: Advancing Today's Discoveries to Improve HealthUL1TR002733 · NCATS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI RINGEL, MATTHEW D · 2018 to 2022
$28.9M
Short Term Training: Students in Health Professional SchoolsT35EY007151 · NEI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Heather Anne Anderson · 1998 to 2026
$1.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002733NEI NIH HHS T35 EY007151
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) have been reported to improve the safety of elderly and normally sighted drivers. The purpose of this study was to assess exposure to, perceived safety of, comfort level with, and interest in using ADAS among drivers with age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Methods: Current drivers aged 60+ years were recruited at four US sites to complete a survey about ADAS and driving habits. Frequency of use and/or perceptions of eight ADAS were investigated. An avoidance score was generated using questions about difficult driving situations. Results: The survey was completed by 166 participants (80 with AMD vs. 86 without). Participants with AMD had worse self-rated vision than those without (34% vs. 2% poor or fair rating), and drove fewer weekly miles (median [interquartile range [IQR] 30 [15 to 75] vs. 60 [30 to 121] miles, P = 0.002). Participants with AMD reported more avoidance of difficult driving situations (P < 0.001). There was no difference in the number of ADAS used by AMD status (median [IQR for AMD = 2.5 [1 to 5] vs. 3 [2 to 4] without, P = 0.87). Greater reported number of ADAS used was associated with less avoidance of difficult situations (P = 0.02). The majority perceived improved safety with most ADAS. Conclusions: Many drivers with AMD utilize common ADAS, which subjectively improve their road safety and may help to reduce self-imposed restrictions for difficult situations and mileage. Translational Relevance: Drivers with AMD are adopting readily available ADAS, for which they reported potential benefits, such as safety and less restrictive driving.

Indexed as

Automobile DrivingMacular DegenerationAccidents, TrafficAgedHumansSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID35311930
PMCPMC8944390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.