Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35311705›Full record

ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2022

Oscillatory Activity of the Hippocampus in Prodromal Alzheimer's Disease: A Source-Space Magnetoencephalography Study.

Janne J Luppi, Deborah N Schoonhoven, Anne M van Nifterick, Alida A Gouw, Arjan Hillebrand, Philip Scheltens, Cornelis J Stam, Willem de Haan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Janne J LuppiAlzheimer Center and Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam UMC, The Netherlands.
Deborah N SchoonhovenAlzheimer Center and Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam UMC, The Netherlands.
Anne M van NifterickAlzheimer Center and Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam UMC, The Netherlands.
Alida A GouwAlzheimer Center and Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam UMC, The Netherlands.
Arjan HillebrandDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology and MEG, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam UMC, The Netherlands.
Philip ScheltensAlzheimer Center and Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam UMC, The Netherlands.
Cornelis J StamDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology and MEG, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam UMC, The Netherlands.
Willem de HaanAlzheimer Center and Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam UMC, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Alzheimer's disease (AD), oscillatory activity of the human brain slows down. However, oscillatory slowing varies between individuals, particularly in prodromal AD. Cortical oscillatory changes have shown suboptimal accuracy as diagnostic markers. We speculated that focusing on the hippocampus might prove more successful, particularly using magnetoencephalography (MEG) for capturing subcortical oscillatory activity.

objectiveWe explored MEG-based detection of hippocampal oscillatory abnormalities in prodromal AD patients.

methodsWe acquired resting-state MEG data of 18 AD dementia patients, 18 amyloid-β-positive amnestic mild cognitive impairment (MCI, prodromal AD) patients, and 18 amyloid-β-negative persons with subjective cognitive decline (SCD). Oscillatory activity in 78 cortical regions and both hippocampi was reconstructed using beamforming. Between-group and hippocampal-cortical differences in spectral power were assessed. Classification accuracy was explored using ROC curves.

resultsThe MCI group showed intermediate power values between SCD and AD, except for the alpha range, where it was higher than both (p < 0.05 and p < 0.001). The largest differences between MCI and SCD were in the theta band, with higher power in MCI (p < 0.01). The hippocampi showed several unique group differences, such as higher power in the higher alpha band in MCI compared to SCD (p < 0.05). Classification accuracy (MCI versus SCD) was best for absolute theta band power in the right hippocampus (AUC = 0.87).

conclusionIn this MEG study, we detected oscillatory abnormalities of the hippocampi in prodromal AD patients. Moreover, hippocampus-based classification performed better than cortex-based classification. We conclude that a focus on hippocampal MEG may improve early detection of AD-related neuronal dysfunction.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionBrainHippocampusHumansMagnetoencephalographyAlzheimer’s diseasedementiahippocampusmagnetoencephalographymild cognitive impairmentspectral analysis

Identifiers

PMID35311705
PMCPMC9198749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.