Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35311685›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2022

Prediction of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbation Events by Using Patient Self-reported Data in a Digital Health App: Statistical Evaluation and Machine Learning Approach.

Francis P Chmiel, Dan K Burns, John Brian Pickering, Alison Blythin, Thomas Ma Wilkinson, Michael J Boniface

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Use of Ecological Momentary Assessment to Measure Dyspnea in COPD.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Francis P ChmielSchool of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0674-8098
Dan K BurnsSchool of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6976-1068
John Brian PickeringSchool of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6815-2938
Alison Blythinmy mHealth Limited, Bournemouth, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6080-0120
Thomas Ma Wilkinson *my mHealth Limited, Bournemouth, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1771-3851
Michael J Boniface *School of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9281-6095
University of Southampton · GBNational Institute for Health Research · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelf-reporting digital apps provide a way of remotely monitoring and managing patients with chronic conditions in the community. Leveraging the data collected by these apps in prognostic models could provide increased personalization of care and reduce the burden of care for people who live with chronic conditions. This study evaluated the predictive ability of prognostic models for the prediction of acute exacerbation events in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease by using data self-reported to a digital health app.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate if data self-reported to a digital health app can be used to predict acute exacerbation events in the near future.

methodsThis is a retrospective study evaluating the use of symptom and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test data self-reported to a digital health app (myCOPD) in predicting acute exacerbation events. We include data from 2374 patients who made 68,139 self-reports. We evaluated the degree to which the different variables self-reported to the app are predictive of exacerbation events and developed both heuristic and machine learning models to predict whether the patient will report an exacerbation event within 3 days of self-reporting to the app. The model's predictive ability was evaluated based on self-reports from an independent set of patients.

resultsUsers self-reported symptoms, and standard chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment tests displayed correlation with future exacerbation events. Both a baseline model (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] 0.655, 95% CI 0.689-0.676) and a machine learning model (AUROC 0.727, 95% CI 0.720-0.735) showed moderate ability in predicting exacerbation events, occurring within 3 days of a given self-report. Although the baseline model obtained a fixed sensitivity and specificity of 0.551 (95% CI 0.508-0.596) and 0.759 (95% CI 0.752-0.767) respectively, the sensitivity and specificity of the machine learning model can be tuned by dichotomizing the continuous predictions it provides with different thresholds.

conclusionsData self-reported to health care apps designed to remotely monitor patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease can be used to predict acute exacerbation events with moderate performance. This could increase personalization of care by allowing preemptive action to be taken to mitigate the risk of future exacerbation events.

Indexed as

chronic diseaseCOPDdigital applicationsdigital healthexacerbation eventshealth care applicationsmachine learningmHealthmobile healthmyCOPDremote monitoring

Identifiers

PMID35311685
PMCPMC8981014
OpenAlexW4221039757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.