Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35311682›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2022

Inequities in Health Care Services Caused by the Adoption of Digital Health Technologies: Scoping Review.

Rui Yao, Wenli Zhang, Richard Evans, Guang Cao, Tianqi Rui, Lining Shen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07121140 (A Pilot Study of Home Blood Transfusions for Patient With Cancer Who Have Transfusion Dependent Cytopenias), which is not on this map. Cited by 246 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
246citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
106.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07121140 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Pilot Study of Home Blood Transfusions for Patient With Cancer Who Have Transfusion Dependent Cytopenias

TypeinterventionalSponsorThomas Jefferson UniversityRan2025 to 2027Enrolled30ConditionsHematologic Malignancy, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Transfusion Dependent CytopeniasArmsHome Blood Transfusion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

246 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 407 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Advancing equity and value in United States healthcare: an umbrella review.International journal for equity in health · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Continuous glucose monitoring in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of barriers and opportunities for care improvement.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2025
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. The level of electronic health literacy among older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2024
    Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Trial
  15. An exploratory study to understand how rurality status and demographic characteristics are associated with enrollment, engagement, and retention in a digital health intervention targeting the Appalachian region.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025
    Trial
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

186 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rui Yao *School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2315-688X
Wenli Zhang *School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9077-4189
Richard EvansFaculty of Computer Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6367-0560
Guang CaoSchool of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5015-2115
Tianqi RuiSchool of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1901-3031
Lining ShenSchool of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7311-8777
Huazhong University of Science and Technology · CNDalhousie University · CAHubei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital health technologies (ie, the integration of digital technology and health information) aim to increase the efficiency of health care delivery; they are rapidly adapting to health care contexts to provide improved medical services for citizens. However, contrary to expectations, their rapid adoption appears to have led to health inequities, with differences in health conditions or inequality in the distribution of health care resources among different populations.

objectiveThis scoping review aims to identify and describe the inequities of health care services brought about by the adoption of digital health technologies. The factors influencing such inequities, as well as the corresponding countermeasures to ensure health equity among different groups of citizens, were also studied.

methodsPrimary studies and literature, including articles and reviews, published in English between 1990 and 2020 were retrieved using appropriate search strategies across the following three electronic databases: Clarivate Analytics' Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus. Data management was performed by two authors (RY and WZ) using Thomson Endnote (Clarivate Analytics, Inc), by systematically screening and identifying eligible articles for this study. Any conflicts of opinion were resolved through discussions with the corresponding author. A qualitative descriptive synthesis was performed to determine the outcomes of this scoping review.

resultsA total of 2325 studies were collected during the search process, of which 41 (1.76%) papers were identified for further analysis. The quantity of literature increased until 2016, with a peak in 2020. The United States, the United Kingdom, and Norway ranked among the top 3 countries for publication output. Health inequities caused by the adoption of digital health technologies in health care services can be reflected in the following two dimensions: the inability of citizens to obtain and adopt technology and the different disease outcomes found among citizens under technical intervention measures. The factors that influenced inequities included age, race, region, economy, and education level, together with health conditions and eHealth literacy. Finally, action can be taken to alleviate inequities in the future by government agencies and medical institutions (eg, establishing national health insurance), digital health technology providers (eg, designing high-quality tools), and health care service recipients (eg, developing skills to access digital technologies).

conclusionsThe application of digital health technologies in health care services has caused inequities to some extent. However, existing research has certain limitations. The findings provide a comprehensive starting point for future research, allowing for further investigation into how digital health technologies may influence the unequal distribution of health care services. The interaction between individual subjective factors as well as social support and influencing factors should be included in future studies. Specifically, access to and availability of digital health technologies for socially disadvantaged groups should be of paramount importance.

Indexed as

Biomedical TechnologyDigital TechnologyDelivery of Health CareHealth ServicesHumansTechnologyUnited Statesdigital health technologieshealth care serviceshealth inequitiesmobile phonescoping reviewsocially disadvantaged groups

Identifiers

PMID35311682
PMCPMC8981004
OpenAlexW4214685553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.