Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35311680›Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical Internet research2022

Effects of a Nurse-Led Telehealth Self-care Promotion Program on the Quality of Life of Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Arkers Kwan Ching Wong, Jonathan Bayuo, Frances Kam Yuet Wong, Wing Shan Yuen, Athena Yin Lam Lee, Pui King Chang, Jojo Tsz Chui Lai

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical Internet research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Arkers Kwan Ching Wong *School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0001-6708-3099
Jonathan BayuoSchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0001-8437-2730
Frances Kam Yuet WongSchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0002-9844-451X
Wing Shan YuenSchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0003-0872-2967
Athena Yin Lam LeeSchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0002-9625-3760
Pui King ChangSchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0003-0568-1346
Jojo Tsz Chui LaiSchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0003-4636-2050
Hong Kong Polytechnic University · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn recent years, telehealth has become a common channel for health care professionals to use to promote health and provide distance care. COVID-19 has further fostered the widespread use of this new technology, which can improve access to care while protecting the community from exposure to infection by direct personal contact, and reduce the time and cost of traveling for both health care users and providers. This is especially true for community-dwelling older adults who have multiple chronic diseases and require frequent hospital visits. Nurses are globally recognized as health care professionals who provide effective community-based care to older adults, facilitating their desire to age in place. However, to date, it is unclear whether the use of telehealth can facilitate their work of promoting self-care to community-dwelling older adults.

objectiveThis review aims to summarize findings from randomized controlled trials on the effect of nurse-led telehealth self-care promotion programs compared with the usual on-site or face-to-face services on the quality of life (QoL), self-efficacy, depression, and hospital admissions among community-dwelling older adults.

methodsA search of 6 major databases was undertaken of relevant studies published from May 2011 to April 2021. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) and their 95% CIs were calculated from postintervention outcomes for continuous data, while the odds ratio was obtained for dichotomous data using the Mantel-Haenszel test.

resultsFrom 1173 possible publications, 13 trials involving a total of 4097 participants were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with the control groups, the intervention groups of community-dwelling older adults significantly improved in overall QoL (SMD 0.12; 95% CI 0.03 to 0.20; P=.006; I

conclusionsThis meta-analysis suggests that employing telehealth in nurse-led self-care promotion programs may have a positive impact on older adults, although more studies are needed to strengthen the evidence base, particularly regarding organization and delivery.

trial registrationPROSPERO (Prospective International Register of Systematic Reviews) CRD42021257299; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=257299.

Indexed as

COVID-19TelemedicineAgedHealth PromotionHumansIndependent LivingNurse's RoleProspective StudiesQuality of LifeSelf Carecommunity-dwelling older adultmeta-analysisnurseself-caretelehealth

Identifiers

PMID35311680
PMCPMC8981017
OpenAlexW4220881117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.