Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35311651›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Directors Association2022

Strong Decay of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Antibodies after 2 BNT162b2 Vaccine Doses and High Antibody Response to a Third Dose in Nursing Home Residents.

Hubert Blain, Edouard Tuaillon, Lucie Gamon, Amandine Pisoni, Stéphanie Miot, Marie-Christine Picot

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Vaccines for the Prevention of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Older Adults.Infectious disease clinics of North America · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hubert BlainDepartment of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, MUSE University, Montpellier, France. Electronic address: h-blain@chumontpellier.fr.
Edouard TuaillonINSERM U 1058/EFS, University Hospital, Montpellier, France.
Lucie GamonClinical Research and Epidemiology Unit, University Hospital, Montpellier, France.
Amandine PisoniINSERM U 1058/EFS, University Hospital, Montpellier, France.
Stéphanie MiotDepartment of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, MUSE University, Montpellier, France.
Marie-Christine PicotClinical Research and Epidemiology Unit, University Hospital, Montpellier, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier · FRInserm · FRUniversité de Montpellier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo measure the antibody decay after 2 BNT162b2 doses and the antibody response after a third vaccine dose administered 6 months after the second one in nursing home residents with and without prior COVID-19.

designCohort study. SETTING AND

participantsFour hundred-eighteen residents from 18 nursing homes.

methodsBlood receptor-binding domain (RBD)-IgG (IgG II Quant assay, Abbott Diagnostics; upper limit: 5680 BAU) and nucleocapsid-IgG (Abbott Alinity) were measured 21‒28 days after the second BNT162b2 dose, as well as 1‒3 days before and 21‒28 days after the third vaccine dose. RBD-IgG levels of ≥592 BAU/mL were considered as high antibody response. Residents with prior positive quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction on a nasopharyngeal swab or with N-IgG levels above 0.8 S/CO were considered as prior COVID-19 residents.

resultsIn prior COVID-19 residents (n = 122), RBD-IgG median levels decreased by 82% in 167 days on average. In the same period, the number of residents with a high antibody response decreased from 88.5% to 54.9% (P < .0001) and increased to 97.5% after the third vaccine dose (P = .02 vs the first measure). In residents without prior COVID-19 (n = 296), RBD-IgG median levels decreased by 89% in 171 days on average. The number of residents with a high antibody response decreased from 29.4% to 1.7% (P < .0001) and increased to 88.4% after the third vaccine dose (P < .0001 vs the first measure). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The strong and rapid decay of RBD-IgG levels after the second BNT162b2 dose in all residents and the high antibody response after the third dose validate the recommendation of a third vaccine dose in residents less than 6 months after the second dose, prioritizing residents without prior COVID-19. The slope of RBD-IgG decay after the third BNT162b2 dose and the protection level against SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 (omicron) and other variants of concern provided by the high post-boost vaccination RBD-IgG response require further investigation in residents.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesAntibodies, ViralAntibody FormationBNT162 VaccineCohort StudiesCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansImmunoglobulin GNursing HomesSARS-CoV-2Antibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesImmunoglobulin GVaccinesBNT162b2 vaccineboost vaccine dosenursing home residentsSARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies

Identifiers

PMID35311651
PMCPMC8864102
OpenAlexW4213010205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.