ReviewMicrobiology spectrum2022
Luciferase Immunosorbent Assay Based on Multiple E Antigens for the Detection of Chikungunya Virus-Specific IgG Antibodies.
Review in Microbiology spectrum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Revisiting the emergence of the Chikungunya virus in Alagoas, Northeast of Brazil.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2025Article
- Chikungunya fever: pathogenesis and mechanisms underlying pain symptoms.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Development of nanobody-based DAS-ELISA and Au nanoparticle-based immunochromatographic test strip for highly sensitive detection of Chikungunya virus.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Article
- Evaluating the clinical utility of semi-quantitative luciferase immunosorbent assay usingEmerging microbes & infections · 2024Article
- A Luciferase Immunosorbent Assay Based on Attachment Glycoprotein for the Rapid and Easy Detection of Nipah Virus IgG Antibodies.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- An improved luciferase immunosorbent assay for ultrasensitive detection of antibodies against African swine fever virus.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, the chikungunya virus (CHIKV) has continued to spread from local epidemics to nonnative habitats until eventually reaching pandemic status. Nonendemic areas such as China have also emerged as potential epidemic areas of CHIKV. Serological detection of CHIKV is the key to diagnosing and controlling the prevalence of this virus. In this study, we review the progress of the serological detection of the envelope (E) protein in CHIKV, and we provide a novel research assay and ideas for the serological detection of CHIKV. The luciferase immunosorbent assay (LISA) does not require species-specific labeled secondary antibodies for detection, making it universally suitable for tracking samples from various animals or carriers. At present, most research on CHIKV antigen detection technology tends to combine two or more proteins to avoid the decrease in detection ability caused by antigen mutation. Our results indicate that two or more kinds of CHIKV E antigens combined with LISA detection can improve the detection rate of anti-CHIKV immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies in CHIKV-infected patient sera and detect antibodies in the early stage of infection accurately and sensitively. After 235 days of infection, the anti-CHIKV IgG antibodies could still be detected in CHIKV-infected patients. All serum samples were tested with a detection rate of 100% after combining various recombinant CHIKV E antigens. Our proposed CHIKV-specific LISA could be a useful tool for serum diagnosis of CHIKV infection and serum epidemic research in areas where CHIKV is endemic, which would help to manage potential epidemics in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.