Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35311322›Full record

ArticleJournal of comparative psychology (Washington, D.C. : 1983)2022

A modified version of the dimensional change card sort task tests cognitive flexibility in children (Homo sapiens) and cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus).

Julie J Neiworth, Marie T Balaban, Kate Wagner, Alexandria Carlsen, Sarah Min, Ye In Christopher Kwon, Isabelle Rieth

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of comparative psychology (Washington, D.C. : 1983), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Inhibitory control tests in non-human animals: validity, reliability, and perspectives.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Julie J NeiworthDepartment of Psychology.ORCID 0000-0002-1266-6876
Marie T BalabanDepartment of Psychology.ORCID 0000-0002-0595-0975
Kate WagnerDepartment of Psychology.ORCID 0000-0002-7863-5247
Alexandria CarlsenDepartment of Psychology.ORCID 0000-0001-5556-3108
Sarah MinDepartment of Psychology.
Ye In Christopher KwonDepartment of Psychology.
Isabelle RiethDepartment of Psychology.ORCID 0000-0001-6222-9597

Funding

Longitudinal Cognitive-Behavioral Testing and Immunohistochemical Assessment of Beta Amyloid Plaques in a Model of Alzheimer's DiseaseR15AG051940 · NIA · CARLETON COLLEGE · PI NEIWORTH, JULIE J · 2017 to 2021
$870k
NIA NIH HHS R15 AG051940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A modified Dimensional Change Card Sort (DCCS) task was used to test cognitive flexibility in adult cotton-top tamarins and children aged 19 months to 60 months. Subjects had to infer a rule from the experience of selecting between two cards to earn a reward, and the pairs of stimuli defined the rule (e.g., pick blue ones, not red ones, or pick trucks, not boats). Two different tests measured subjects' ability to shift to a reversal of the rule (intradimensional shift) and to shift to a new rule defined by a dimension previously irrelevant (interdimensional shift). Both adult tamarins and children aged 49-60 months were able to learn the initial rule and switch to a reversal and to a rule based on a different dimension. In contrast, the two younger groups of children, aged 19-36 months and aged 37-48 months, could switch when a reversal was imposed but took significantly longer to learn a new rule on a former irrelevant dimension. Experiment 2 presented a wider set of novel stimuli which shared some features with the original set to further explore the basis of rule learning. The result was that tamarins and 52- to 60-month-old children both chose novel stimuli that fit the rule and had no a priori associative strength, suggesting a rule application not solely based on associative strength. Importantly, novel items introduced some risk for choice, and children showed themselves to be risk-averse, whereas tamarins were risk-prone within a novel context. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

LearningSaguinusAdultAnimalsChildChild, PreschoolCognitionHumansReward

Identifiers

PMID35311322
PMCPMC11131561
OpenAlexW4221028352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.