ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
A Classifier for Improving Early Lung Cancer Diagnosis Incorporating Artificial Intelligence and Liquid Biopsy.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence-enabled liquid biopsy in cancer: a systematic review and meta- analysis of diagnostic performance and biological implications.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Tracing the history of clinical practice of liquid biopsy: a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- Knowledge mapping analysis of ground glass nodules: a bibliometric analysis from 2013 to 2023.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence-assisted early screening of lung cancer and accurate diagnosis of pulmonary nodules: research progress and clinical prospects from radiomics to multi-omics integration: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-powered liquid biopsy in cancer: a paradigm shift in cancer detection and personalized care.Cancer cell international · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Lung Cancer: A Narrative Review of Recent Advances in Diagnosis, Biomarker Discovery, and Drug Development.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Review
- OM-85, a Bacterial Lysate, Reduces Pulmonary Nodule Malignant Probability: A Retrospective Study.The clinical respiratory journal · 2025Article
- Liquid Biopsy: The Challenges of a Revolutionary Approach in Oncology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- A Thorough Review of the Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Lung Cancer.Cancers · 2025Review
- Minimally invasive biomarkers for triaging lung nodules-challenges and future perspectives.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2025Review
- Convergence of evolving artificial intelligence and machine learning techniques in precision oncology.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- An early lung cancer diagnosis model for non-smokers incorporating ct imaging analysis and circulating genetically abnormal cells (CACs).BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Liquid Biopsy for Medical Imaging Analysis in Cancer Diagnosis.Current pharmaceutical design · 2025Review
- Liquid biopsy into the clinics: Current evidence and future perspectives.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2024Review
- Status of breast cancer detection in young women and potential of liquid biopsy.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Lung cancer clustering by identification of similarities and discrepancies of DNA copy numbers using maximal information coefficient.PloS one · 2024Article
- Review
- The diagnostic value of circulating abnormal cells in early lung cancer.American journal of cancer research · 2023Article
- An artificial intelligence-assisted diagnostic system for the prediction of benignity and malignancy of pulmonary nodules and its practical value for patients with different clinical characteristics.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide and in China. Screening for lung cancer by low dose computed tomography (LDCT) can reduce mortality but has resulted in a dramatic rise in the incidence of indeterminate pulmonary nodules, which presents a major diagnostic challenge for clinicians regarding their underlying pathology and can lead to overdiagnosis. To address the significant gap in evaluating pulmonary nodules, we conducted a prospective study to develop a prediction model for individuals at intermediate to high risk of developing lung cancer. Univariate and multivariate logistic analyses were applied to the training cohort (n = 560) to develop an early lung cancer prediction model. The results indicated that a model integrating clinical characteristics (age and smoking history), radiological characteristics of pulmonary nodules (nodule diameter, nodule count, upper lobe location, malignant sign at the nodule edge, subsolid status), artificial intelligence analysis of LDCT data, and liquid biopsy achieved the best diagnostic performance in the training cohort (sensitivity 89.53%, specificity 81.31%, area under the curve [AUC] = 0.880). In the independent validation cohort (n = 168), this model had an AUC of 0.895, which was greater than that of the Mayo Clinic Model (AUC = 0.772) and Veterans' Affairs Model (AUC = 0.740). These results were significantly better for predicting the presence of cancer than radiological features and artificial intelligence risk scores alone. Applying this classifier prospectively may lead to improved early lung cancer diagnosis and early treatment for patients with malignant nodules while sparing patients with benign entities from unnecessary and potentially harmful surgery. Clinical Trial Registration Number: ChiCTR1900026233, URL: http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=43370.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.