Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35311112›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

A Classifier for Improving Early Lung Cancer Diagnosis Incorporating Artificial Intelligence and Liquid Biopsy.

Maosong Ye, Lin Tong, Xiaoxuan Zheng, Hui Wang, Haining Zhou, Xiaoli Zhu, Chengzhi Zhou, Peige Zhao, Yan Wang, Qi Wang and 20 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Liquid Biopsy: The Challenges of a Revolutionary Approach in Oncology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors.

Maosong YeDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Lin TongDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaoxuan ZhengDepartment of Respiratory Endoscopy, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Hui WangXinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, China.
Haining ZhouDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Respiratory Center of Suining Central Hospital, Suining, China.
Xiaoli ZhuDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Chengzhi ZhouState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Peige ZhaoDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Yan WangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng, China.
Qi WangDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Li BaiDepartment of Respiratory Disease, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Zhigang CaiThe First Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Feng-Ming Spring KongClinical Oncology Center, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Yuehong WangDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Yafei LiDepartment of Epidemiology, College of Preventive Medicine, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Mingxiang FengDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xin YeJoint Research Center of Liquid Biopsy in Guangdong, Hong Kong, and Macao, Zhuhai, China.
Dawei YangDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Zilong LiuDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Quncheng ZhangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Ziqi WangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Shuhua HanDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Lihong SunDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng, China.
Ningning ZhaoDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng, China.
Zubin YuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Juncheng ZhangJoint Research Center of Liquid Biopsy in Guangdong, Hong Kong, and Macao, Zhuhai, China.
Xiaoju ZhangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Ruth L KatzChaim Sheba Hospital, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Jiayuan SunDepartment of Respiratory Endoscopy, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Chunxue BaiDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide and in China. Screening for lung cancer by low dose computed tomography (LDCT) can reduce mortality but has resulted in a dramatic rise in the incidence of indeterminate pulmonary nodules, which presents a major diagnostic challenge for clinicians regarding their underlying pathology and can lead to overdiagnosis. To address the significant gap in evaluating pulmonary nodules, we conducted a prospective study to develop a prediction model for individuals at intermediate to high risk of developing lung cancer. Univariate and multivariate logistic analyses were applied to the training cohort (n = 560) to develop an early lung cancer prediction model. The results indicated that a model integrating clinical characteristics (age and smoking history), radiological characteristics of pulmonary nodules (nodule diameter, nodule count, upper lobe location, malignant sign at the nodule edge, subsolid status), artificial intelligence analysis of LDCT data, and liquid biopsy achieved the best diagnostic performance in the training cohort (sensitivity 89.53%, specificity 81.31%, area under the curve [AUC] = 0.880). In the independent validation cohort (n = 168), this model had an AUC of 0.895, which was greater than that of the Mayo Clinic Model (AUC = 0.772) and Veterans' Affairs Model (AUC = 0.740). These results were significantly better for predicting the presence of cancer than radiological features and artificial intelligence risk scores alone. Applying this classifier prospectively may lead to improved early lung cancer diagnosis and early treatment for patients with malignant nodules while sparing patients with benign entities from unnecessary and potentially harmful surgery. Clinical Trial Registration Number: ChiCTR1900026233, URL: http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=43370.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceearly diagnosisliquid biopsylung cancerprediction model

Identifiers

PMID35311112
PMCPMC8924612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.