Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35311090›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Prognostic Value of Postoperative Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients With Early- and Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Ke Ye, Qinqiao Fan, Mingming Yuan, Dong Wang, Liang Xiao, Guo Long, Rongrong Chen, Tongdi Fang, Zengbo Li, Ledu Zhou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Is Cell-Free DNA Testing in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Ready for Prime Time?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ke YeDepartment of General Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Qinqiao FanDepartment of Hepatobiliary Tumour Surgery, Chenzhou No.1 People's Hospital, Chenzhou, China.
Mingming YuanDepartment of Medicine, Geneplus-Beijing, Beijing, China.
Dong WangDepartment of Liver Disease Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Liang XiaoDepartment of General Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Guo LongDepartment of General Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Rongrong ChenDepartment of Medicine, Geneplus-Beijing, Beijing, China.
Tongdi FangDepartment of General Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Zengbo LiDepartment of General Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Ledu ZhouDepartment of General Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Central South University · CNChenzhou First People's Hospital · CNQingdao University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Majority of patients with resected early- and intermediate-stage liver cancer will experience postoperative recurrence. This study aimed to investigate the application of ctDNA sequencing in the postoperative period of hepatocellular carcinoma. A total of 96 patients with liver cancer were enrolled in this study. Postoperative peripheral blood samples were collected from all patients after surgery and analyzed using hybridization capture-based next-generation sequencing. Identification of at least one somatic mutation in the peripheral blood was defined as ctDNA+. Five genetic features in tumor tissues were associated with disease-free survival (DFS) using Lasso-Cox model. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.813 and 0.882 in training and validation cohorts, respectively. The recurrence rate in ctDNA+ and ctDNA- groups was 60.9% and 27.8%, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that the postoperative ctDNA was an independent prognostic predictor of DFS (HR [hazard ratio]: 6.074, 95% Cl [confidence interval]: 2.648-13.929, P<0.001) and overall survival (OS) (HR: 4.829, 95% CI: 1.508-15.466, P=0.008). Combined ctDNA with AFP improved prediction performance. The median DFS was 2.0, and 8.0 months in ctDNA+/AFP-H and ctDNA+/AFP-L groups, respectively; while ctDNA-/AFP-H and ctDNA-/AFP-L groups had not reached the median time statistically (Log-rank test,

Indexed as

alpha-fetoproteincirculating tumor DNAliver cancernext-generation sequencingpostoperative recurrence

Identifiers

PMID35311090
PMCPMC8931326
OpenAlexW4214838598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.