ReviewDEN open2022
Endoscopic resection of superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumor.
Review in DEN open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Cold Resection for Superficial Non-Ampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumors: Current Evidence and Clinical Perspectives.DEN open · 2027Review
- Article
- Underwater Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Tips and Tricks.Current gastroenterology reports · 2026Review
- Recent Advances in Gastrointestinal Cancer Endoscopic Diagnosis and Treatment: Focusing on Older Adults.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026Review
- Utility of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection combined with a protruding anchor by saline injection for superficial non-ampullary duodenal tumors: a retrospective study in Japan.Clinical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Risk factors for delayed bleeding after endoscopic resection of non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors and the effectiveness of complete mucosal closure in high-risk patients.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- The "Asclepius tube": a slim drainage tube wrapped around the distal part of the endoscope for cecal endoscopic submucosal dissection.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2025Article
- Laparoscopic and endoscopic co-operative surgery for a non-ampullary duodenal tumor after living-donor liver transplantation: a case report.Journal of surgical case reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Successful iatrogenic duodenal perforation treatment with endoscopic hand suturing.Clinical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Review
- A method of "Noninjecting Resection using Bipolar Soft coagulation mode; NIRBS" for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumor: a pilot study.BMC gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Endoscopic resection for non-ampullary duodenal subepithelial lesions: a retrospective cohort study.International journal of colorectal disease · 2024Article
- Article
- Safety of Duodenal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Superficial Non-Ampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumor: A Single-Center Study in the United States.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- Efficacy and safety of cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection for superficial duodenal epithelial neoplasia ≤ 10 mm.Endoscopy international open · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumor (SNADET) was previously considered a rare disease, in recent years, the opportunities to detect and treat SNADET are increasing. Considering the high morbidity of pancreatoduodenectomy, endoscopic resection can be a treatment option that preserves the organs and contributes maintain patients' quality of life. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is a standard treatment for relatively small lesions in gastrointestinal tracts, however, it is difficult because submucosal fibrosis frequently occurs due to the previous biopsy. Recently, some modified EMR techniques including underwater EMR (UEMR) and cold polypectomy (CP) have been proposed. In UEMR, the duodenal lumen is filled with water or saline and resected the targe lesion with a snare without injection into the submucosa. It would be a treatment option that could reduce candidates for ESD especially SNADET less than 20 mm. CP was reported as a safe and convenient means for SNADET. It would also be one of the standard treatments for diminutive lesions, though there remain some concerns on its resectability. ESD for SNADET is technically challenging, especially with an extremely high risk of adverse event (AE) with a reported bleeding rate of more than 20% and perforation rate up to about 40%. However, modified treatment techniques including the water pressure method and pocket creation method have been reported to potentially contribute to improving outcomes of ESD. Moreover, accumulated evidence shows closing the mucosal defect significantly reduces delayed adverse events after duodenal endoscopic treatments. Further studies are warranted to elucidate curative criteria, long-term outcomes, and appropriate surveillance strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.