Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35310754›Full record

ArticleDEN open2022

Visibility evaluation of colorectal lesion using texture and color enhancement imaging with video.

Naoto Tamai, Hideka Horiuchi, Hiroaki Matsui, Hiroto Furuhashi, Shunsuke Kamba, Akira Dobashi, Kazuki Sumiyama

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in DEN open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Detection of colorectal adenomas with texture and color enhancement imaging: Multicenter observational study.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2023
    Observational
  16. Image enhanced colonoscopy: updates and prospects-a review.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Naoto TamaiDepartment of Endoscopy The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9183-7353
Hideka HoriuchiDepartment of Endoscopy The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.
Hiroaki MatsuiDepartment of Endoscopy The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1485-0474
Hiroto FuruhashiDepartment of Endoscopy The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6487-7528
Shunsuke KambaDepartment of Endoscopy The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.
Akira DobashiDepartment of Endoscopy The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4882-3220
Kazuki SumiyamaDepartment of Endoscopy The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7976-6070

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the visibility of colorectal lesions using a novel image processing algorithm, texture and color enhancement imaging (TXI), that allows the acquisition of brighter images with enhanced color and surface structure. Methods: During August-September 2019, patients referred for endoscopic treatment were prospectively recruited. Electronic data acquired while observing colorectal lesions using white light imaging (WLI) were obtained and recorded: WLI, TXI mode1 (with color enhancement), and TXI mode2 (without color enhancement) videos were constructed. The lesions were also recorded using narrow-band imaging (NBI) from the same perspective as WLI. Four video clips (WLI, TXI mode1, TXI mode2, and NBI) were made per lesion. Thereafter, video files for evaluations were prepared by randomly arranging all video clips. Finally, visualization scores were evaluated by four endoscopists, and the WLI, TXI mode1, TXI mode2, and NBI results were compared. Results: Overall, 22 patients with 68 lesions were recruited; the video file for evaluation subsequently comprised 272 randomly arranged video clips. Mean visualization scores using WLI, TXI mode1, TXI mode2, and NBI were 70.0 (±20.1), 80.5 (±18.6), 75.6 (±18.1), and 69.0 (±20.6), respectively. Mean visualization scores for flat lesions using WLI, TXI mode1, TXI mode2, and NBI were 64.1 (±21.2), 76.5 (±20.18), 71.8 (±19.4), and 64.2 (±22.0), respectively. Visualization scores using TXI mode1 were significantly better than those using WLI, TXI mode2, or NBI. Conclusions: TXI enables improved visualization of colorectal lesions, even flat lesions, than WLI and NBI. TXI may allow better detection of colorectal lesions, although further prospective studies are required.

Indexed as

colorectal cancerimage‐enhanced endoscopynarrow‐band imagingtexture‐enhanced imaging

Identifiers

PMID35310754
PMCPMC8828205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.