ArticleDEN open2022
Novel clip device for prevention of bleeding after endoscopic papillectomy.
Article in DEN open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Is routine placement of hemoclips during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography necessary for preventing delayed bleeding?BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Nationwide Survey on Endoscopic Papillectomy for Ampullary Adenoma: Current Practices and Variability.Gut and liver · 2026Article
- Prophylactic Closure of Mucosal Defect to Prevent Delayed Bleeding After Endoscopic Papillectomy.Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026Article
- Endoscopic Papillectomy for Ampullary Gangliocytic Paraganglioma: A Case Series and Literature Review.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2025Review
- Article
- Successful Indirect Clipping for the Bleeding Source of Colonic Diverticular Hemorrhage Using a Reopenable Clip (Regrasping Technique).ACG case reports journal · 2024Article
- Use of a novel clip-band device for difficult biliary cannulation due to papillary edema after precutting.Endoscopy · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Recently, a novel clip device, SureClip Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 40 patients who underwent EP for ampullary neoplasms between October 2009 and March 2020. Prophylactic closure after resection was performed using the conventional clip between 2014 and 2018, and with the SureClip Results: The median age of the patients (25 males and 15 females) was 70 years. The en block resection rate was 82.5% and the curative resection rate was 80.0%. Histologically, 11 (27.5%) patients had malignancy. Prophylactic closure was performed in 29 (72.5%) patients (17 conventional clips, 12 SureClip Conclusions: In the present study, prophylactic clipping of the mucosal break using the SureClip
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.