ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022
Wheat Spike Detection and Counting in the Field Based on SpikeRetinaNet.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Study on automatic detection of wheat spike grain number based on deep learning.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based evaluation of seed priming and biostimulant applications in rainfed wheat.PeerJ · 2026Article
- Transfer learning models for wheat ear detection on multi-source dataset.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Lightweight deep neural network for contour detection and extraction of wheat spikes in complex field environments.Plant methods · 2025Article
- RGB imaging and computer vision-based approaches for identifying spike number loci for wheat.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- Research on detection and counting method of wheat ears in the field based on YOLOv11-EDS.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Automatic detection and counting of wheat spike based on DMseg-Count.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A generalized model for accurate wheat spike detection and counting in complex scenarios.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Lightweight Corn Leaf Detection and Counting Using Improved YOLOv8.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Oriented feature pyramid network for small and dense wheat heads detection and counting.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Feature diffusion reconstruction mechanism network for crop spike head detection.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- CTHNet: a network for wheat ear counting with local-global features fusion based on hybrid architecture.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Improved YOLO-FastestV2 wheat spike detection model based on a multi-stage attention mechanism with a LightFPN detection head.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Automatic grading evaluation of winter wheat lodging based on deep learning.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Overlapped tobacco shred image segmentation and area computation using an improved Mask RCNN network and COT algorithm.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Image-based classification of wheat spikes by glume pubescence using convolutional neural networks.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Semi-supervised Counting of Grape Berries in the Field Based on Density Mutual Exclusion.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2023Article
- WheatSpikeNet: an improved wheat spike segmentation model for accurate estimation from field imaging.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Detection method of wheat spike improved YOLOv5s based on the attention mechanism.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The number of wheat spikes per unit area is one of the most important agronomic traits associated with wheat yield. However, quick and accurate detection for the counting of wheat spikes faces persistent challenges due to the complexity of wheat field conditions. This work has trained a RetinaNet (SpikeRetinaNet) based on several optimizations to detect and count wheat spikes efficiently. This RetinaNet consists of several improvements. First, a weighted bidirectional feature pyramid network (BiFPN) was introduced into the feature pyramid network (FPN) of RetinaNet, which could fuse multiscale features to recognize wheat spikes in different varieties and complicated environments. Then, to detect objects more efficiently, focal loss and attention modules were added. Finally, soft non-maximum suppression (Soft-NMS) was used to solve the occlusion problem. Based on these improvements, the new network detector was created and tested on the Global Wheat Head Detection (GWHD) dataset supplemented with wheat-wheatgrass spike detection (WSD) images. The WSD images were supplemented with new varieties of wheat, which makes the mixed dataset richer in species. The method of this study achieved 0.9262 for mAP50, which improved by 5.59, 49.06, 2.79, 1.35, and 7.26% compared to the state-of-the-art RetinaNet, single-shot multiBox detector (SSD), You Only Look Once version3 (Yolov3), You Only Look Once version4 (Yolov4), and faster region-based convolutional neural network (Faster-RCNN), respectively. In addition, the counting accuracy reached 0.9288, which was improved from other methods as well. Our implementation code and partial validation data are available at https://github.com/wujians122/The-Wheat-Spikes-Detecting-and-Counting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.