Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35310533›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)2022

Care transitions intervention reduces ED revisits in cognitively impaired patients.

Manish N Shah, Gwen C Jacobsohn, Courtney Mc Jones, Rebecca K Green, Thomas V Caprio, Amy L Cochran, Jeremy T Cushman, Michael Lohmeier, Amy J H Kind

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A systematic review of interventions for persons living with dementia: The Geriatric ED Guidelines 2.0.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Patient experiences of a care transition intervention for Veterans to reduce emergency department visits.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2023
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Manish N ShahBerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison Wisconsin USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6331-1074
Gwen C JacobsohnBerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison Wisconsin USA.
Courtney Mc JonesDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of Rochester Medical Center Rochester New York USA.
Rebecca K GreenBerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison Wisconsin USA.
Thomas V CaprioDepartment of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics University of Rochester Medical Center Rochester New York USA.
Amy L CochranDepartment of Population Health Sciences University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison Wisconsin USA.
Jeremy T CushmanDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of Rochester Medical Center Rochester New York USA.
Michael LohmeierBerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison Wisconsin USA.
Amy J H KindDepartment of Medicine (Geriatrics and Gerontology) University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison Wisconsin USA.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · US

Funding

University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR002373 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ELIZABETH S BURNSIDE, Allan R. Brasier · 2017 to 2026
$75.9M
Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterP30AG062715 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Henrik Zetterberg · 2019 to 2026
$34.5M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002374 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Bo Liu, Marin Leigh Schweizer · 2017 to 2026
$9.7M
Paramedic-coached ED Care Transitions to Help Older Adults Maintain their HealthR01AG050504 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI SHAH, MANISH N · 2015 to 2019
$2.9M
Mentoring and Research in Patient-Oriented Geriatric Emergency CareK24AG054560 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI SHAH, MANISH N · 2017 to 2021
$955k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002374NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002373NIA NIH HHS K24 AG054560NIA NIH HHS P30 AG062715NIA NIH HHS R01 AG050504
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: About half of older adults with impaired cognition who are discharged home from the emergency department (ED) return for further care within 30 days. We tested the effect of an adapted Care Transitions Intervention (CTI) at reducing ED revisits in this vulnerable population. Methods: We conducted a pre-planned subgroup analysis of community-dwelling, cognitively impaired older (age ≥60 years) participants from a randomized controlled trial testing the effectiveness of the CTI adapted for ED-to-home transitions. The parent study recruited ED patients from three university-affiliated hospitals from 2016 to 2019. Subjects eligible for this sub-analysis had to: (1) have a primary care provider within these health systems; (2) be discharged to a community residence; (3) not receive care management or hospice services; and (4) be cognitively impaired in the ED, as determined by a score >10 on the Blessed Orientation Memory Concentration Test. The primary outcome, ED revisits within 30 days of discharge, was abstracted from medical records and evaluated using logistic regression. Results: Of our sub-sample (N = 81, 36 control, 45 treatment), 57% were female and the mean age was 78 years. Multivariate analysis, adjusted for the presence of moderate to severe depression and inadequate health literacy, found that the CTI significantly reduced the odds of a repeat ED visit within 30 days (odds ratio [OR] 0.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.07 to 0.90) but not 14 days (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.26 to 3.93). Multivariate analysis of outpatient follow-up found no significant effects. Discussion: Community-dwelling older adults with cognitive impairment receiving the CTI following ED discharge experienced fewer ED revisits within 30 days compared to usual care. Further studies must confirm and expand upon this finding, identifying features with greatest benefit to patients and caregivers.

Indexed as

care transitionscare transitions interventioncognitive impairmentcommunity paramedicinedementiaemergencyemergency department

Identifiers

PMID35310533
PMCPMC8919246
OpenAlexW4220816791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.