Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35310532›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)2022

Barriers to seeking care for memory problems: A vignette study.

Mireille Jacobson, Elizabeth Joe, Julie Zissimopoulos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Barriers to seeking care for memory problems: A vignette study.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.) · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mireille JacobsonUniversity of Southern California Davis School of Gerontology Los Angeles California USA.
Elizabeth JoeDepartment of Neurology, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine Los Angeles California USA.
Julie ZissimopoulosUniversity of Southern California Davis School of Gerontology Los Angeles California USA.

Funding

USCADRC Diversity Supplement PachicanoP30AG066530 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI HELENA Chang CHUI, ARTHUR W TOGA · 2020 to 2026
$27.8M
NBER Center for Aging and Health Research-Post COVID-19 Experiences Among Adults with ADRDP30AG012810 · NIA · NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH · PI DAVID M CUTLER · 1999 to 2026
$24.6M
USC Resource Center for Minority Aging Research (US-RCMAR)P30AG043073 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI EMMA AGUILA, JENNIFER A AILSHIRE · 2012 to 2026
$10.1M
EXPANDING MHAS RESEARCH INFRASTRUCTURE WITH HISTORICAL CLIMATE AND LIFETIME WORKPLACE ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURES INFLUENCING INEQUITIES IN AD/ADRDP30AG066589 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI DANA P GOLDMAN, JULIE M ZISSIMOPOULOS · 2020 to 2026
$6.1M
Reducing Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Alzheimer's Disease: Role of ACOsR01AG055401 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI ZISSIMOPOULOS, JULIE M · 2017 to 2019
$2.8M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG012810NIA NIH HHS P30 AG043073NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066530NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066589NIA NIH HHS R01 AG055401
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study compares how older adults judge the need for follow-up care for memory-related problems when they are responding about themselves versus someone of the same age.

methodsAdults ages 65 and over in the Understanding America Study, a nationally representative internet panel, were invited to participate in a short survey with three vignettes describing memory-related problems associated with normal aging, mild cognitive impairment, and mild dementia. Respondents were randomly assigned to vignettes about themselves or about an individual of the same age and asked whether the problems warranted follow-up discussion with a health-care provider. Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted differences in the percent of affirmative responses to follow-up discussion and an index, ranging from 0 to 3, that summed affirmative responses, were compared across respondents randomly assigned to self- versus other-framed vignettes.

resultsOne thousand six hundred twenty-eight panel members (81.6%) completed the survey (mean age, 72.3 [range, 65-102], 801 female [49.2%] and 827 male [50.8%]) with 796 (48.9%) randomly assigned to vignettes about themselves and 832 (51.1%) to vignettes about individuals of the same age. Percent affirming need for follow-up ranged from 66.9% to 90.5% and was systematically lower for those randomized to vignettes about themselves. The differences ranged from -10.8 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], -13.6 to -7.9 percentage points) for the most severe to -13.9 percentage points (95% CI, -18.1 to -9.7 percentage points) for the mildest memory-related problem vignettes. The summary index was -0.444 points (95% CI, 0.563 to -0.326) or 0.491 of a standard deviation (95% CI, 0.622σ to -0.362σ) lower for scenarios about participants themselves relative to others. DISCUSSION: Seniors were more likely to recognize and recommend follow-up for memory-related problems affecting someone else than the same problems affecting themselves, suggesting symptom education alone may not improve rates of cognitive assessment for detection of impairment and dementia.

Indexed as

follow‐up carememory‐related problemsvignette study

Identifiers

PMID35310532
PMCPMC8919244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.