ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)2022
A three-range approach enhances the prognostic utility of CSF biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease.
Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Alzheimer's disease-Biomarkers, clinical evaluation or both?Journal of neuropsychology · 2025Article
- Promising clinical tools for specific Alzheimer disease diagnosis from plasma pTau217 and ApoE genotype in a cognitive disorder unit.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Considerations in the clinical use of amyloid PET and CSF biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Review
- Estrogen, menopause, and Alzheimer's disease: understanding the link to cognitive decline in women.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Review
- Article
- Associations of endogenous estrogens, plasma Alzheimer's disease biomarkers, andFrontiers in aging neuroscience · 2024Article
- The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative in the era of Alzheimer's disease treatment: A review of ADNI studies from 2021 to 2022.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024Review
- Review
- Clinical characteristics of patients with suspected Alzheimer's disease within a CSF Aß-ratio grey zone.Neurological research and practice · 2023Article
- Prevalence and Clinical Implications of a β-Amyloid-Negative, Tau-Positive Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarker Profile in Alzheimer Disease.JAMA neurology · 2023Article
- A three-range approach enhances the prognostic utility of CSF biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Alzheimer's disease consensus recommends biomarker dichotomization, a practice with well-described clinical strengths and methodological limitations. Although neuroimaging studies have explored alternative biomarker interpretation strategies, a formally defined three-range approach and its prognostic impact remains under-explored for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers . Methods: With two-graph receiver-operating characteristics based on different reference schemes, we derived three-range cut-points for CSF Elecsys biomarkers. According to baseline CSF status, we assessed the prognostic utility of this in predicting risk of clinical progression and longitudinal trajectories of cognitive decline and amyloid-beta (Aβ) positron emission tomography (PET) accumulation in non-demented individuals (Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative [ADNI]; n = 1246). In all analyses, we compared herein-derived three-range CSF cut-points to previously described binary ones. Results: In our main longitudinal analyses, we highlight CSF p-tau Discussion: The proposed approach can refine clinico-biological prognostic assessment and potentially enhance trial recruitment, as it captures faster biomarker-related cognitive decline in comparison to binary cut-points. Although this approach has implications for trial recruitment and observational studies, further discussion is needed regarding clinical practice applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.