Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35310478›Full record

ReviewChemical science2022

Can super-resolution microscopy become a standard characterization technique for materials chemistry?

Shikha Dhiman, Teodora Andrian, Beatriz Santiago Gonzalez, Marrit M E Tholen, Yuyang Wang, Lorenzo Albertazzi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Visualizing the Heterogeneity in Homogeneous Supramolecular Polymers.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Beyond DNA: new probes for PAINT super-resolution microscopy.Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Personal Perspective on Understanding Low Molecular Weight Gels.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shikha DhimanLaboratory of Macromolecular and Organic Chemistry, Eindhoven University of Technology P. O. Box 513 5600 MB Eindhoven The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9180-5071
Teodora AndrianInstitute of Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC), Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology Barcelona Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7926-8418
Beatriz Santiago GonzalezDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Institute of Complex Molecular Systems, Eindhoven University of Technology Eindhoven The Netherlands l.albertazzi@tue.nl.
Marrit M E TholenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Institute of Complex Molecular Systems, Eindhoven University of Technology Eindhoven The Netherlands l.albertazzi@tue.nl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4066-6064
Yuyang WangInstitute for Complex Molecular Systems, Eindhoven University of Technology P. O. Box 513 5600 MB Eindhoven The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5175-8389
Lorenzo AlbertazziInstitute of Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC), Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology Barcelona Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6837-0812

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The characterization of newly synthesized materials is a cornerstone of all chemistry and nanotechnology laboratories. For this purpose, a wide array of analytical techniques have been standardized and are used routinely by laboratories across the globe. With these methods we can understand the structure, dynamics and function of novel molecular architectures and their relations with the desired performance, guiding the development of the next generation of materials. Moreover, one of the challenges in materials chemistry is the lack of reproducibility due to improper publishing of the sample preparation protocol. In this context, the recent adoption of the reporting standard MIRIBEL (Minimum Information Reporting in Bio-Nano Experimental Literature) for material characterization and details of experimental protocols aims to provide complete, reproducible and reliable sample preparation for the scientific community. Thus, MIRIBEL should be immediately adopted in publications by scientific journals to overcome this challenge. Besides current standard spectroscopy and microscopy techniques, there is a constant development of novel technologies that aim to help chemists unveil the structure of complex materials. Among them super-resolution microscopy (SRM), an optical technique that bypasses the diffraction limit of light, has facilitated the study of synthetic materials with multicolor ability and minimal invasiveness at nanometric resolution. Although still in its infancy, the potential of SRM to unveil the structure, dynamics and function of complex synthetic architectures has been highlighted in pioneering reports during the last few years. Currently, SRM is a sophisticated technique with many challenges in sample preparation, data analysis, environmental control and automation, and moreover the instrumentation is still expensive. Therefore, SRM is currently limited to expert users and is not implemented in characterization routines. This perspective discusses the potential of SRM to transition from a niche technique to a standard routine method for material characterization. We propose a roadmap for the necessary developments required for this purpose based on a collaborative effort from scientists and engineers across disciplines.

Identifiers

PMID35310478
PMCPMC8864713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.