Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35310472›Full record

ReviewCanadian geriatrics journal : CGJ2022

Safety and Tolerability of Fesoterodine in Older Adult Patients with Overactive Bladder.

John Heesakkers, Manon Te Dorsthorst, Adrian Wagg

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Canadian geriatrics journal : CGJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. An Investigational Study on the Role ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

John HeesakkersDepartment of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Manon Te DorsthorstDepartment of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Adrian WaggDepartment of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Older patients (> 65 yr) suffering from overactive bladder (OAB) are more likely to have functional impairment and comorbidity than those without OAB. This article reviews available published studies and discusses how fesoterodine might meet the specific needs of the older OAB patient. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was undertaken in order to evaluate fesoterodine safety in older OAB patients. Results: Fesoterodine offers flexible dosing, allowing the clinician to balance risk and benefits according to the symptoms and preferences of the patient. Its balanced affinity for M2 and M3 muscarinic receptors may lead to its benefit on OAB symptoms. Its active metabolite is a P-gp substrate that is actively transported from the central nervous system (CNS), potentially avoiding adverse CNS effects. Fesoterodine can be used in mild or moderate hepatic or renal insufficiency and no dose adjustment is routinely required. Fesoterodine's benefit has been demonstrated in multiple clinical trials in older and medically vulnerable patients. Fesoterodine was rated as "beneficial" in the LUTS-FORTA classification due to its efficiency and tolerability in older patients. Conclusion: Here, the use of fesoterodine in older and vulnerable patients is summarized given the need to approach pharmacotherapy for OAB differently in older adults.

Indexed as

fesoterodineLUTS-FORTAolder patientstolerabilityvulnerable patient

Identifiers

PMID35310472
PMCPMC8887709
OpenAlexW4214929774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.