Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35310374›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2022

Renal function changes associated with transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve for prosthetic regurgitation compared to stenosis.

Matthew S Katz, Kevin L Greason, Juan A Crestanello, Sunil V Mankad, Mayra E Guerrero, Rajiv Gulati, Mohamad Alkhouli, Hector I Michelena, Vuyisile T Nkomo, Charanjit S Rihal and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Recent highlights from theInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthew S KatzDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Kevin L GreasonDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Juan A CrestanelloDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Sunil V MankadDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Mayra E GuerreroDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Rajiv GulatiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Mohamad AlkhouliDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Hector I MichelenaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Vuyisile T NkomoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Charanjit S RihalDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Mackram F EleidDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Renal dysfunction is frequently encountered in patients with aortic prosthesis degeneration requiring valve-in-valve (VIV) transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The effect of VIV TAVR on renal function in patients with bioprosthetic aortic regurgitation (AR) and stenosis (AS) is unknown. Objectives: The aims of this study were to describe the change in renal function after VIV TAVR and to compare differences in renal function changes in those with predominant prosthetic regurgitation compared to stenosis. Methods: All VIV TAVR between June of 2014, and October 2019 (n = 141) at a single institution were reviewed. Baseline renal function parameters including estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were compared with post-discharge follow-up values in both prosthetic AR and AS patient groups. Linear regression analysis was performed to determine correlates of renal function change. Results: Mean baseline eGFR was lower in the AR group (55 SD21 vs. 64 SD24 ml/min/1.73 m Conclusions: Patients who underwent VIV TAVR for AR experienced significant improvement of renal function at post-discharge follow-up. More advanced renal dysfunction at baseline was associated with greater improvement in renal function at post discharge in AR patients.

Indexed as

Aortic RegurgitationAortic StenosisAortic Valve ReplacementAR, Aortic RegurgitationAS, Aortic StenosisCardio-renal syndromeCKD, Chronic Kidney DiseaseeGFR, Estimated Glomerular Filtration RatePOD, post-operative dayTAVRTAVR, Transcatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementValve-in-valveVIV, Valve in Valve

Identifiers

PMID35310374
PMCPMC8927844
OpenAlexW4220900559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.