ArticleInfection and drug resistance2022
Pulmonary and Disseminated
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Treatment of non-tuberculosis mycobacteria skin infections.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Detection of Methods: We encountered two patients with suspected MAC infections after surgery: patient 1 had a pulmonary nodule that was initially suspected to be lung cancer and was excised under video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Patient 2, who was under treatment with steroids and anti-IL-6 inhibitors for rheumatoid arthritis, was suspected to have disseminated ileocecal cancer with metastasis to the lung and skin. In both cases, we postoperatively detected MAC genes in paraffin-embedded tissue sections using the novel mycobacterial nucleic acid identification test, ie tissue-direct polymerase chain reaction (tdPCR)-based nucleic acid lateral flow immunoassay (NALFIA). Both patients showed granulomatous lesions with hematoxylin-eosin staining, and mycobacteria by Ziehl-Neelsen staining in tissue sections from the lung and skin, respectively, although MAC were not isolated from the sections. MAC genes were finally detected by tdPCR-NALFIA in both cases. Conclusion: Although Ziehl-Neelsen staining and culture tests are the gold standard in identifying causative mycobacteria, the rapid results of tdPCR-NALFIA performed simultaneously with sputum and/or tissue culture may make it an important auxiliary diagnostic tool for identifying mycobacterial infection, leading to improvement in the management of MAC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.