ReviewBioactive materials2022
Cells and material-based strategies for regenerative endodontics.
Review in Bioactive materials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Does the use of different scaffolds have an impact on the therapeutic efficacy of regenerative endodontic procedures? A systematic evaluation and meta-analysis.BMC oral health · 2024Pooled it
- Bioactive molecule delivery platforms in regenerative endodontic therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Cell transplantationPooled it
- Decellularized Dental Pulp Matrix Hydrogel Promotes Functional Endodontic Regeneration In Situ.International endodontic journal · 2026Article
- A histopathological case-control study of severe turner teeth and normal teeth: structural and compositional alterations in pulp and periodontal tissues.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Dual-engineered extracellular vesicles enabling endothelial targeting and EphrinB2 delivery for pulp revascularization.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
- Hydrogel-based strategies for dentin-pulp complex regeneration: a comprehensive review.Cell and tissue banking · 2026Review
- Biopolymer-Based 3D Printing for Dental-Pulp Complex Tissue Regeneration: Innovations and Challenges.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Evaluation of the effects of different irrigation activation techniques on the surface roughness of dentin and blood clot in regenerative endodontic models.Lasers in medical science · 2026Article
- Stem cell-driven biomedical technologies for tooth regeneration: engineering scaffolds, organoid models, and molecular targeted strategies.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Review
- In Vitro Biocompatibility of Calcium Silicate-Based Materials for Retrograde Endodontic Treatment Under Different Setting Conditions.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Regenerative Strategies in Pediatric Dentistry: A Comprehensive Overview of Tissue Engineering from Past to Future.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- An injectable bioceramics-containing composite hydrogel promoting innervation for pulp-dentin complex repair.International journal of oral science · 2025Article
- In Vitro Bioactivity and Cytotoxicity Assessment of Two Root Canal Sealers.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- ECM remodeling by PDGFRβ+ dental pulp stem cells drives angiogenesis and pulp regeneration via integrin signaling.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Article
- Regenerative endodontic therapy: From laboratory bench to clinical practice.Journal of advanced research · 2025Review
- Regenerative Endodontic Therapies: Harnessing Stem Cells, Scaffolds, and Growth Factors.Polymers · 2025Review
- Engineering organoids for dental pulp tissue regeneration and functional reconstruction.Regenerative medicine · 2025Review
- Review
- Graphene-Based Materials for Bone Regeneration in Dentistry: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Applications and Material Comparisons.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Dental pulp mesenchymal stem cells-response to fibrin hydrogel reveals ITGA2 and MMPs expression.Heliyon · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
<p class = "Abstract" style = "margin: 0 cm; line-height: 32px; font-size: 12 pt; font-family: "Times New Roman", serif; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); "><span lang = "EN-US">The carious process leads to inflammation of pulp tissue. Current care options include root canal treatment or apexification. These procedures, however, result in the loss of tooth vitality, sensitivity, and healing. Pulp capping and dental pulp regeneration are continually evolving techniques to regenerate pulp tissue, avoiding necrosis and loss of vitality. Many studies have successfully employed stem/progenitor cell populations, revascularization approaches, scaffolds or material-based strategies for pulp regeneration. Here we outline advantages and disadvantages of different methods and techniques which are currently being used in the field of regenerative endodontics. We also summarize recent findings on efficacious peptide-based materials which target the dental niche.<o:p></o:p></span></p>.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.