Trial reportJournal of healthcare engineering2022
Study on Maximal Oxygen Uptake of Respiration and Heart Rate in Exercise Training Based on Regression Equation.
Trial report in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Retracted: Study on Maximal Oxygen Uptake of Respiration and Heart Rate in Exercise Training Based on Regression Equation.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-10-11Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Informed/Patient Consent - None/Withdrawn · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Lack of IRB/IACUC Approval and/or Compliance · Paper Mill · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate the important index of maximum oxygen uptake in evaluating cardiopulmonary function and to provide a basis for the evaluation of cardiopulmonary function for adolescents, a total of 200 healthy adolescents aged 12-14 were selected, and these 200 subjects were randomly assigned to the modeling group and the test group. In the first stage, data of 150 subjects were randomly selected, and the regression equation for VO2max was established by adding independent variables such as gender, age, height, weight, body mass index, and resting heart rate. In the second stage, the remaining 50 subjects were selected as the test group to test and evaluate the prediction effect of the prediction model. The results showed that the correlation coefficient between the measured value of maximal oxygen uptake and the predicted value was 0.983, and the significance level was 0.000, which was significantly lower than 0.01 correlation, indicating that there was an obvious concomitant relationship between the two values. The maximum oxygen uptake calculated by this equation is good and has a good application prospect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.