ArticleDEN open2021
Endoscopic and pathologic motifs for the clinical diagnosis of Epstein-Barr virus-associated gastric cancer.
Article in DEN open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Postoperative Adjuvant Treatment Decision for Early Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated Gastric Cancer.Journal of medical cases · 2026Article
- Case Report: Massive polypoid early Epstein-Barr virus-associated gastric carcinoma in a young immunocompromised host.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Endoscopic Diagnosis and Therapy for Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated Gastric Cancer.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Epstein-Barr virus detection in endoscopic submucosal dissection-proven early gastric cancer with mixed-type histology.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Gastric lymphoepithelial-like carcinoma presenting as a sub-mucosal mass: a case report and literature review.American journal of translational research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Based on the recent therapeutic trends for gastric cancer (GC), the clinical impact of the diagnosis of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated GC (EBVaGC) appears to be important. We retrospectively analyzed endoscopic and pathologic motifs of GC lesions to narrow the number of candidates for EBV testing. Methods: We performed EBV tests for 32 upper gastrointestinal lesions of 32 patients in the clinical setting. These tests were ordered by endoscopists or by pathologists without an endoscopist's order. EBV-encoded small RNA1 (EBER1) in situ hybridization was used for the EBV tests. The endoscopic motif for the EBV test was the location in the upper part of the stomach or remnant stomach, mainly the depressed type with a submucosal tumor-like protrusion of the lesion. The pathologic motif was carcinoma with lymphoid stroma (CLS) or CLS-like histology of the lesion. We retrospectively analyzed the results of EBV tests for the endoscopic and pathologic motifs. Results: The final pathological diagnoses of the 32 subjects were 26 GCs including CLS, gastric endocrine cell carcinoma, gastric hepatoid carcinoma, gastric T-cell lymphoma, gastritis of the remnant stomach, esophageal adenocarcinoma, and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. When nontypical lesions were excluded, the EBER1-positive rate was 42.3% (11/26) in GCs. Of the 14 GC lesions ordered examined by endoscopists, three (21.4%) were EBVaGC. Eight of the 12 (66.7%) GCs ordered examined by pathologists were EBVaGC. Conclusions: The pathologic motif is expected to be useful and the endoscopic motif may be helpful for EBVaGC diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.