ReviewDEN open2021
Technical tips and recent development of endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy.
Review in DEN open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Balloon Catheter Versus Drill Dilator for EUS-Guided Hepaticogastrostomy Stent Placement: A Randomized Clinical Trial.United European gastroenterology journal · 2025Trial
- Article
- Role of Endoscopic Ultrasonography in Management of Pancreaticobiliary Cancers: Recent Trends and Advances.Cancers · 2026Review
- Review
- Role of Endoscopy in Malignant Biliary Obstruction.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Changing the Flow: How EUS-Guided Drainage is Reshaping the Management of Distal Malignant Biliary Obstruction.United European gastroenterology journal · 2026Review
- Biliary drainage in patients with altered anatomy: Literature review of different endoscopic approaches.World journal of gastroenterology · 2026Review
- Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided choledochoduodenostomy without tract dilation using a novel ultra-tapered slim-delivery metallic stent.Endoscopy · 2025Article
- Review
- Clinical evaluation of a novel fluoroscopic mode for improving visibility during interventional endoscopic ultrasound (with video).Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Advances in Endoscopic Ultrasound in Pancreatic Cancer Screening, Diagnosis, and Palliative Care.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Curved puncture technique using a flexible stainless-steel needle in endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy.Endoscopy · 2024Article
- Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary interventions.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2024Review
- Advances in self-expandable metal stents for endoscopic ultrasound-guided interventions.Clinical endoscopy · 2024Review
- Mechanical evaluation of the dilation force of dilation devices during interventional endoscopic ultrasound.Endoscopy international open · 2024Article
- Safety and efficacy of novel oblique-viewing scope for B2-endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy.Clinical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy versus choledochoduodenostomy for malignant biliary obstruction: A meta-analysis.DEN open · 2024Review
- Refractory benign biliary stricture due to chronic pancreatitis in two patients treated using endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy fistula creation: case reports.Clinical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Review
- EUS-Guided Choledochoduodenostomy after Failed Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Distal Malignant Biliary Obstruction.GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Various efforts to improve technical success rates and decrease adverse event rates have also been described in endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided choledochoduodenostomy (CDS). In particular, lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) may open novel opportunities in EUS-biliary drainage (BD). To date, various studies have been reported with EUS-CDS using LAMS, so we should clarify the benefits and limitations of recent EUS-CDS based on developments in both techniques and devices. In this review, we provide technical tips and describe recent developments in EUS-CDS, along with a review of the recent literature (between 2015 and 2020). The overall technical success rate is 95.0% (939/988), and the overall clinical success rate is 97.0% (820/845). The most frequent adverse event is cholangitis or cholecystitis (24.5%, 27/110). According to previous review, pneumoperitoneum (28%, 9/34) or peritonitis associated with bile leak (23.5%, 8/34) was most commonly observed. This difference might be based on improvements in dilation devices or the use of covered metal stents. Several randomized controlled trials comparing EUS-CDS and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for malignant biliary obstruction have recently been reported. To summarize, overall technical success rates for ERCP and EUS-CDS were 92.7% (101/109) and 91.1% (72/79), respectively (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.