Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35310126›Full record

ArticleGynecology and minimally invasive therapy

Ultrasound-guided Needle Biopsy for Preoperative Assessment of Uterine Fibroids: Our Experience and a Review of the Literature.

Carlo Alboni, Ludovica Camacho Mattos, Stefania Malmusi, Maria Cristina Galassi, Fabio Facchinetti, Mohamed Mabrouk

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecology and minimally invasive therapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Carlo AlboniMinimally Invasive and Robotic Gynecologic Surgery Unit, Sassuolo, Italy.
Ludovica Camacho MattosMinimally Invasive and Robotic Gynecologic Surgery Unit, Sassuolo, Italy.
Stefania MalmusiObstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Sassuolo Civil Hospital, Sassuolo, Italy.
Maria Cristina GalassiObstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Sassuolo Civil Hospital, Sassuolo, Italy.
Fabio FacchinettiObstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Policlinico di Modena, University of Modena and reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Mohamed MabroukCambridge Endometriosis and Endoscopic Surgery Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, England.
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leiomyomas are the most common uterine benign tumor, and their malignant counterpart leiomyosarcomas are extremely rare. Despite this, a preoperative diagnosis could be useful for safe surgical minimally invasive management. At present, some clinical and ultrasound findings help recognizing lesions at risk of malignancy. We tried to implement a technique for the preoperative diagnosis for lesions at risk performing ultrasound-guided biopsies of suspected lesions in ten patients. Among them, one case was diagnosed as malignant by the needle biopsy. All patients underwent surgery for myomectomy or hysterectomy, and the histology was confirmed in all cases. No complications occurred. The review of the literature shows other similar experiences of preoperative biopsy of uterine lesions, showing good results for the differential diagnosis between uterine sarcoma and leiomyoma. In our experience, despite the small number of patients enrolled, this technique is safe and effective to plan minimally invasive surgery of uterine fibroids.

Indexed as

Biopsiesdifferential diagnosisleiomyomaleiomyosarcomaultrasound

Identifiers

PMID35310126
PMCPMC8926054
OpenAlexW4213060182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.